This paper assessed the different sources of principles in the civil procedure between Indonesia and the Netherlands. Indonesia still uses the Inlands...
This paper presents a timely and critical comparative assessment of civil procedure principles in Indonesia and the Netherlands, focusing on their res...
The treatment of prisoners often still deviates from human rights standards. In fact, prisoners are entitled to the same protection before the law as...
This study addresses a critical and persistent issue in human rights law: the treatment of prisoners in correctional institutions, which frequently fa...
Separate legal entity doctrine is a foundation in corporation law, and courts have generally resisted deviations from it, save in specific instances i...
This paper proposes a timely and relevant comparative study on the Piercing the Corporate Veil (PCV) doctrine, a critical exception to the fundamental...
This article compares the legal policies implemented by France, Argentina, and Indonesia in addressing economic crises. The research method used in th...
This article undertakes a timely and ambitious comparative study of legal policies adopted by France, Argentina, and Indonesia in response to economic...
Legal formalism plays a crucial role in ensuring consistency and predictability in judicial decision-making. However, excessive formalism can obstruct...
This paper tackles a highly relevant and perennially debated issue within legal scholarship: the delicate balance between procedural formalism and the...
The policy on providing contraceptive devices for school-aged children and adolescents in Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024 on Health does not clar...
This study tackles a highly pertinent and sensitive issue concerning public health and legal policy in Indonesia: Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024...
The article analyzes the admissibility of evidence under Directive 2014/41/EU, focusing on a new constitutive rule for evidentiary action recognized b...
The article, "Is a new constitutive rule born or rather brought to life? Interpreting admissibility of evidence based on the judgment of the CJEU in t...
The aim of this article is to critically analyze the concept of the tragic case proposed by Manuel Atienza, starting from the same basis – the work of...
This article, titled "Are There Really 'Tragic Cases'?", presents a sharp critical analysis of Manuel Atienza's concept of the "tragic case." The auth...
This text aims to explore the moments of divergence and convergence between the constructions that led to the emergence of the rule of law and the Rec...
The paper proposes to delve into a highly pertinent and complex area of comparative constitutional and public law: the conceptual evolution, divergenc...
The rule of law is fundamentally anchored in the legality of state actions, ensures that state bodies operate within the legal frames. The interplay b...
This paper, titled "Proportionality vs. legalism," offers a compelling argument for the fundamental coherence of legalism and proportionality within t...
Showing 391 to 400 of 557 results
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria