Florencia Baez Damiano

Reseña de Lauria, Daniela. 2022. Lengua y política. Historia crítica de los diccionarios del español de la Argentina. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires (EUDEBA).

Introduction

Reseña de lauria, daniela. 2022. Lengua y política. Historia crítica de los diccionarios del español de la argentina. Buenos aires (argentina): editorial universitaria de buenos aires (eudeba).. Descubre la reseña de 'Lengua y política', un análisis crítico de Daniela Lauria sobre la historia de los diccionarios del español en Argentina y su vínculo político.

Abstract

Review

The submission presents a title for a book review, "Reseña de Lauria, Daniela. 2022. Lengua y política. Historia crítica de los diccionarios del español de la Argentina. Buenos Aires (Argentina): Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires (EUDEBA)." This title effectively identifies the work being reviewed, providing comprehensive bibliographic details including the author, publication year, full title, and publisher. The clarity and completeness of the title adhere to scholarly standards for referencing a specific publication. However, a critical component of this submission, the abstract, is entirely absent. An abstract is indispensable for any academic work, serving as a concise summary that outlines the main arguments, methodology, key findings, and significance of the piece. In the context of a book review, an abstract would typically convey the reviewer's overall assessment of the book, highlight its strengths and weaknesses, and situate its contribution within the relevant scholarly discourse. Its omission severely hinders the ability of readers and indexing services to quickly grasp the content and value of the review. Consequently, in its current state, the submission is incomplete and lacks the essential context required for proper evaluation. While the title is exemplary, the complete absence of an abstract renders the submission unsuitable for publication or further review. It is strongly recommended that the author provide a well-structured and informative abstract that summarizes the review's critical perspective, the book's main themes, and its perceived impact, before any substantive assessment of the review's content can be undertaken.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.