Nurmita Sari, Hafiz Elfiansya Parawu, Ahmad Taufik

Strategi Meningkatkan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Pembangunan Desa yang Berkelanjutan

Introduction

Strategi meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembangunan desa yang berkelanjutan. Optimalkan partisipasi masyarakat untuk pembangunan desa berkelanjutan. Studi di Desa Ilan Batu Uru menyoroti strategi dan area perbaikan dalam perencanaan, implementasi, dan pengawasan.

Abstract

Community participation in village development is essential to achieve sustainable and inclusive development. When communities are actively involved in the development process, they feel ownership and responsibility for the results achieved. This research aims to analyse strategies to increase community participation in the development of Ilan Batu Uru Village, West Walenrang Sub-district, Luwu Regency. The research method used in this research is a qualitative research method, which is a form of research that aims to understand and describe phenomena about strategies to increase community participation in village development by analysing behaviour, perceptions, interests, motivations, actions, by presenting data in a description in the form of words or language. The results show that the strategy of increasing community participation in increasing community participation is good enough. However, it needs to be improved to be more optimal, this can be seen from the aspects of planning, implementation and supervision.

Review

This paper addresses a highly pertinent and critical topic: strategies for enhancing community participation in sustainable village development. The authors clearly articulate their objective to analyze such strategies within the specific context of Ilan Batu Uru Village, West Walenrang Sub-district, Luwu Regency. Given the fundamental role of local engagement in achieving inclusive and lasting development outcomes, the research premise is commendable and aligns with current global development discourse. The choice of a qualitative research methodology is appropriate for exploring the nuanced behaviors, perceptions, interests, and motivations that underpin community involvement. While the study's localized focus provides a valuable specific context, the abstract's description of both the methodology and the results could benefit from greater precision. The explanation of the qualitative approach, though generally sound, is somewhat generic and not detailing specific data collection techniques employed (e.g., in-depth interviews, focus group discussions) that would bolster confidence in the rigor of data gathering. More critically, the results section is rather vague; the phrasing "strategy of increasing community participation in increasing community participation is good enough" is redundant and lacks the academic specificity expected. While it identifies areas for improvement in "planning, implementation, and supervision," the abstract does not provide any concrete examples or preliminary insights into *what* specific strategies were found to be effective, or *what specific improvements* are needed in these aspects, thus limiting the reader's understanding of the study's key findings. Despite these points, the core research question remains important, and the full paper holds the potential to offer valuable, context-specific insights into fostering village participation. For future iterations and for the full manuscript, it would be highly beneficial for the authors to elaborate significantly on the specific strategies identified, clearly articulate the detailed findings related to planning, implementation, and supervision, and provide concrete recommendations derived from their analysis. Refining the abstract to present more precise and impactful results will undoubtedly enhance the paper's overall contribution and academic appeal, making its findings more accessible and actionable for practitioners and policymakers in sustainable village development.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.