Farah Salma Rubbiyanti, Fawwaz As’ad Rizqullah

Pandangan Sosiologis Politik terhadap Hak Veto PBB: Penolakan terhadap Gencatan Senjata Permanen dalam Konflik di Gaza

Introduction

Pandangan sosiologis politik terhadap hak veto pbb: penolakan terhadap gencatan senjata permanen dalam konflik di gaza. Analisis sosiologis politik hak veto PBB atas penolakan gencatan senjata permanen di Gaza. Mengkaji implikasi negatif, etika politik Islam, keadilan, HAM, dan reformasi sistem keamanan global.

Abstract

The prolonged conflict in Gaza has raised global concerns, particularly regarding the role of the UN and the use of veto power in addressing the conflict. This article aims to critically examine the use of the UN veto power, especially regarding the rejection of a permanent ceasefire in the Gaza conflict, from sociological view of politics. Using a qualitative approach and analyzing primary and secondary literature, this article highlights the negative implications of the UN veto power and its ethical criticisms in the context of the Gaza conflict. The analysis results show that the Islamic political ethics perspective emphasizes the importance of justice, equality, and recognition of human rights in resolving the conflict. In conclusion, a sustainable solution to the Gaza conflict should involve active participation from the international community, reform of the world security system, and recognition of the basic rights of the Palestinian people.

Review

This article critically examines the United Nations' veto power, specifically its use in rejecting a permanent ceasefire in the Gaza conflict, from a sociological political perspective. Addressing a highly pertinent and globally concerning issue, the paper aims to dissect the mechanisms and implications of this power. The title effectively signals a focused analysis that promises to blend a specific academic lens with a pressing contemporary crisis. Overall, the abstract suggests a timely and ambitious inquiry into the ethical and practical failures of the current international security architecture, making a compelling case for its relevance to current geopolitical debates. The methodology employed, a qualitative approach based on primary and secondary literature analysis, is appropriate for a critical examination of this nature. A significant strength appears to be the incorporation of an Islamic political ethics perspective, which is highlighted as emphasizing justice, equality, and human rights. This analytical framework offers a potentially unique and valuable lens through which to critique the negative implications and ethical shortcomings of the UN veto power, moving beyond conventional international relations discourse. The findings point towards a multi-layered critique, linking the exercise of veto power to broader issues of humanitarian concern and ethical governance. While the abstract clearly outlines the paper's scope and key arguments, the full article would benefit from a more explicit exposition of how the "sociological view of politics" specifically articulates and frames the ethical criticisms, particularly in conjunction with the "Islamic political ethics perspective." Clarifying the interplay between these two analytical frameworks would strengthen the paper's theoretical contribution. Furthermore, while the conclusion rightly calls for international participation, world security system reform, and recognition of Palestinian rights, the discussion within the paper should thoroughly elaborate on how its sociological and ethical findings specifically underpin and inform these proposed sustainable solutions. Nonetheless, this promises to be a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse on international governance, human rights, and conflict resolution.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.