Tiyas Vika Widyastuti, Sanusi Sanusi, Fajar Dian Aryani, Soesi Idayanti

Embracing Local Wisdom: Enriching Environmental Law Development through the Humanist Lens of Pancasila

Introduction

Embracing local wisdom: enriching environmental law development through the humanist lens of pancasila. Explore how local wisdom, guided by Pancasila's humanist philosophy, enriches environmental law development in Indonesia, promoting ecological preservation and human well-being.

Abstract

The response to changes in legal frameworks is of paramount importance, particularly in the context of Indonesia's vision for an ideal legal system grounded in Pancasila. This article asserts that legal development should be attentive to existing legal sources, with a strong emphasis on norms that have been deeply integrated into cultural contexts and local wisdom. Central to Pancasila is a humanist philosophy, primarily encapsulated in its second precept, which underpins the values embraced by Indonesian society. The principles inherent in Pancasila humanism advocate for a shared national understanding, respect for democratic freedoms, social equity, and recognition of diverse religious beliefs, all while upholding human dignity and rights. This article constructs arguments for the integration of local wisdom into the legal framework governing environmental management and protection, highlighting its crucial role in ecological preservation and the well-being of the human environment. Indigenous knowledge, characterized by principles such as non-discrimination, deliberation, honesty, and harmony, emerges as a vital source of social capital that can significantly enhance the development of environmental law from the perspective of Pancasila humanism.

Review

The article "Embracing Local Wisdom: Enriching Environmental Law Development through the Humanist Lens of Pancasila" proposes a compelling and highly relevant inquiry into the foundations of environmental law in Indonesia. By explicitly grounding legal development in Pancasila's humanist philosophy, particularly its second precept, the authors articulate a timely call to integrate culturally embedded norms and local wisdom into the national legal framework. This approach promises a nuanced understanding of how an ideal legal system can resonate with indigenous knowledge systems, offering a significant contribution to both Indonesian legal scholarship and broader discourse on culturally appropriate environmental governance and sustainability. The premise of leveraging existing, deeply integrated cultural sources for legal advancement is particularly commendable and aligns with contemporary calls for more inclusive legal frameworks. The abstract effectively outlines a robust conceptual framework, positing Pancasila humanism as the crucial bridge for integrating local wisdom into environmental law. It delineates key tenets of Pancasila's humanist philosophy—including shared national understanding, respect for democratic freedoms, social equity, and recognition of diverse religious beliefs—as foundational values for upholding human dignity and rights. The article intends to construct arguments for the practical integration of indigenous knowledge, characterized by principles such as non-discrimination, deliberation, honesty, and harmony, into environmental management and protection. This synthesis of philosophical underpinnings and practical application of local wisdom as "social capital" suggests a promising analytical depth in exploring how these principles can genuinely enhance ecological preservation and human well-being within the Indonesian context. While the abstract presents a strong theoretical argument, the full paper would benefit from elaborating on the specific mechanisms and methodologies for actualizing this integration. Further exploration into concrete examples of local wisdom practices and how they interact with existing formal environmental regulations, as well as potential challenges in harmonizing diverse local norms with a national legal framework, would greatly enrich the discussion. Additionally, a deeper dive into how the "social capital" inherent in indigenous knowledge can be formally recognized and operationalized within a legal context, perhaps with case studies, could provide crucial practical insights. If these aspects are thoroughly addressed, this article has the potential to offer not only a profound theoretical contribution but also actionable pathways for developing more culturally resonant and effective environmental law in Indonesia.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.