Atikah Salma Hidayati, Munawar Rahmat, Risris Hari Nugraha

Disparity Between Self-Report Scores and Observed Ethical Verbal Communication Practices: A Mixed-Methods Study of One Adab-Based School and One Mainstream School

Introduction

Disparity between self-report scores and observed ethical verbal communication practices: a mixed-methods study of one adab-based school and one mainstream school. Explore disparities between self-reported ethical verbal communication and observed practices among students in an adab-based and a mainstream school. A mixed-methods study.

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to compare self-report scores for verbal communication ethics with observed communication practices at one adab-based school and one mainstream school selected purposively. The comparison is limited to these two institutional contexts and is not intended to represent all adab-based or mainstream schools. Design/methods/approach – This study employed a convergent mixed-methods design with a comparative quantitative component. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected during overlapping periods, analyzed separately, and then integrated through a joint display at the interpretation stage. The analytical sample comprised 80 students in Grades IV through VI, with 40 students from each school. Data were obtained through a 50-item four-point Likert questionnaire, nonparticipant observations, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analysis included descriptive statistics, the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the Mann-Whitney U test, while observational and interview data were analyzed using descriptive thematic analysis. Findings – Students’ self-report scores were higher at the mainstream school (M = 179.50; SD = 14.394) than at the adab-based school (M = 167.15; SD = 17.696), U = 426.00, Z = -3.601, p < .001, r = .40. However, SBA-OBS documented requests for permission, low tone of voice, controlled verbal responses, and some coarse words; SU-OBS documented coarse words, raised tones, shouting, and polite expressions in certain situations. The qualitative findings extended and, in some respects, contradicted the ordering of the self-report scores, but did not permit cross-school frequency comparisons, causal inference, or claims of sustained behavioral change. Research implications – The findings indicate that self-reported ethical verbal communication behavior was not fully parallel with the communication practices observed at the two schools. Data integration is necessary to distinguish among self-reported behavior, observed practices, and institutional contexts. Interpretation is limited by the two-school sample, the absence of demographic matching, limited documentation of observations and data cleaning, and the absence of direct measurement of social desirability bias.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.