Andrés Ordóñez

Comercio, raza y cultura. La Italia de Mussolini, Iberoamérica y el México posrevolucionario

Introduction

Comercio, raza y cultura. La italia de mussolini, iberoamérica y el méxico posrevolucionario. Explora las relaciones políticas, económicas y culturales entre la Italia de Mussolini, Iberoamérica y México (1920-1940), analizando comercio, raza y cultura.

Abstract

La relación política, económica y cultural de Italia con México y los países iberoamericanos entre 1920 y 1940 es inseparable de la crisis finisecular decimonónica y la emergencia de prácticas marcadas por los totalitarismos que habrían de configurar la cultura política del siglo xx. En ese contexto, la construcción autoritaria mussoliniana no sólo orientó las estrategias y los intercambios comerciales y culturales con los países iberoamericanos; también constituyó un modelo de pensamiento político que, en muchos sentidos, estructuró la cultura política de no pocos países del subcontinente. Dicha orientación permeó de manera profunda el imaginario político de México y las demás naciones hispano-lusitanas, y sus huellas son palpables hasta nuestros días. Este ensayo aborda el fenómeno antes descrito a partir de la articulación estratégica de tres elementos específicos: la aproximación comercial de Italia sobre la base de su diáspora en Iberoamérica, el rescate de los vínculos histórico-culturales compartidos y la reivindicación de una supuesta comunidad racial cuya diversidad encontraría unidad en una latinidad originada pretendidamente en la era imperial de Roma.

Review

The proposed essay, "Comercio, raza y cultura. La Italia de Mussolini, Iberoamérica y el México posrevolucionario," promises a fascinating and timely exploration of the multifaceted relationship between Fascist Italy and Latin American nations, with a particular focus on post-revolutionary Mexico, from the 1920s to the 1940s. The abstract effectively situates this inquiry within the broader context of fin-de-siècle crises and the emergence of totalitarian political cultures in the 20th century. The central argument, that Mussolini's authoritarian project served not only as a driver for commercial and cultural exchanges but also as a significant model for political thought in the region, is compelling and suggests a nuanced understanding of historical influence that extends beyond traditional diplomatic narratives. A key strength of this work lies in its strategic articulation of three distinct yet interconnected elements: the commercial approach leveraging the Italian diaspora, the invocation of shared historical-cultural ties, and the controversial claim of a unified "Latin" racial community rooted in imperial Rome. This tripartite analytical framework offers a robust lens through which to examine the depth and breadth of Italian influence, moving beyond simplistic notions of political alignment to explore subtle ideological penetration. The abstract also commendably highlights the enduring legacy of these interactions, asserting that their "huellas son palpables hasta nuestros días," which invites an examination of historical continuity and transformation. It would be particularly interesting to see how the concept of a "supuesta comunidad racial" was navigated and adapted within the specific political and cultural landscape of post-revolutionary Mexico, especially given its own complex relationship with indigenous identity and nation-building. Overall, this essay appears to be a highly significant contribution to the fields of international relations, cultural history, and political science, particularly concerning the interwar period and the global reach of authoritarian ideologies. By dissecting the complex interplay of commerce, culture, and manufactured racial identity, the author promises to illuminate a critical chapter in the political imaginary of Latin America. The proposed analysis of how Mussolini's project constituted a "modelo de pensamiento político" for the sub-continent offers a rich avenue for further scholarly discussion and could provide valuable insights into the transnational flows of political ideas. This promises to be an insightful and well-structured piece, likely to stimulate considerable discussion and enhance our understanding of 20th-century geopolitical and cultural dynamics.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.