Felix Patiung

Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Implementasi Kebijakan Perlindungan Whistleblower Di Kepolisian Indonesia: Studi Kasus Di Polri Samarinda

Introduction

Tinjauan hukum terhadap implementasi kebijakan perlindungan whistleblower di kepolisian indonesia: studi kasus di polri samarinda. Studi hukum ini menganalisis implementasi perlindungan whistleblower di Polri Samarinda, mengungkap kendala struktural & budaya. Temukan rekomendasi reformasi untuk transparansi kepolisian.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi kebijakan perlindungan whistleblower di POLRI Samarinda serta mengidentifikasi kendala yang dihadapi dalam penerapannya. Perlindungan terhadap whistleblower adalah elemen penting dalam mendorong transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam institusi kepolisian. Meskipun Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2006 telah mengatur perlindungan tersebut, implementasinya di POLRI Samarinda menghadapi berbagai kendala, termasuk budaya organisasi yang menekan, ketidakjelasan prosedur, serta pengaruh politik eksternal. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan, kebijakan internal POLRI, dan data dari wawancara serta laporan tahunan POLRI Samarinda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun ada upaya untuk memperbaiki mekanisme perlindungan, tantangan struktural dan kultural masih menjadi penghambat utama. Disarankan adanya reformasi dalam struktur dan budaya organisasi serta penggunaan teknologi untuk meningkatkan efektivitas perlindungan whistleblower.

Review

This paper, "Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Implementasi Kebijakan Perlindungan Whistleblower Di Kepolisian Indonesia: Studi Kasus Di Polri Samarinda," addresses a highly pertinent and critical issue concerning transparency and accountability within public institutions, specifically the Indonesian National Police. The research aims to analyze the implementation of whistleblower protection policies in POLRI Samarinda and identify the practical obstacles encountered. By focusing on a specific regional police unit, the study offers valuable insights into the on-the-ground realities of legal frameworks like Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2006, highlighting the persistent challenges in fostering an environment conducive to ethical reporting. The timely nature of this research is commendable, given the global emphasis on good governance and anti-corruption efforts within law enforcement. The abstract effectively outlines several significant impediments to effective whistleblower protection, including a suppressive organizational culture, unclear procedures, and external political influences. These findings underscore a critical gap between legal provisions and their practical application, identifying structural and cultural factors as primary obstacles. The chosen methodology, described as "juridis normatif," appears appropriate for analyzing legal frameworks and internal policies, complemented by empirical data from interviews and annual reports. This mixed-method approach, if robustly executed, has the potential to provide a comprehensive understanding of both the legal landscape and the socio-organizational dynamics at play. However, the abstract could benefit from a clearer indication of the depth and breadth of the empirical data collected, particularly regarding the nature of the interviews and the specific insights gleaned from them. The paper concludes with relevant recommendations, advocating for reform in organizational structure and culture, alongside the strategic utilization of technology to enhance protection mechanisms. These suggestions are well-aligned with the identified challenges and point towards tangible areas for improvement. The study's contribution lies in its specific focus on a key Indonesian institution, providing a nuanced understanding of a complex issue often generalized in broader discussions. Future research could potentially expand on these recommendations by exploring specific implementation strategies for cultural reform, evaluating the effectiveness of proposed technological solutions, or conducting comparative studies with other regions or institutions to identify best practices. Overall, this paper promises to be a valuable addition to the discourse on legal protection, institutional transparency, and police reform in Indonesia.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.