Muhamad Syahril Jalaludin Jamil

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: URGENSI HARMONISASI REGULASI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA

Introduction

Restorative justice: urgensi harmonisasi regulasi dalam sistem peradilan pidana indonesia. Mengkaji urgensi harmonisasi regulasi restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Analisis peraturan perundang-undangan demi penyelesaian tindak pidana yang sistematis.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk.mengkaji bagaimana pengaturan restorative justice dalam peraturan perundang-undangan pidana di Indonesia saat ini. Penelitian dilakukan secara normative dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia telah mengatur mengenai restorative justice baik sebagai pendekatan penyelesaian tindak pidana ataupun sebagai proses. Pengaturannya dapat ditemukan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana, kemudian diatur dalam Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 8 Tahun 2021, Perja Nomor 15 Tahun 2020, Perma Nomor 4 tahun 2014 dan Nomor 1 Tahun 2024. Meskipun demikian perlu dilakukan harmonisasi terkait syarat matriil dan formiil dalam berbagai regulasi tersebut agar tercipta harmonisasi peraturan perundang-undangan secara sistematis.

Review

This paper, titled "RESTORATIVE JUSTICE: URGENSI HARMONISASI REGULASI DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA," delves into a highly pertinent and critical issue within the Indonesian legal landscape. The research aims to comprehensively examine the current regulatory framework governing restorative justice (RJ) within the country's criminal justice system. Employing a normative methodology, with a focus on legislative and conceptual approaches, the study seeks to map out how RJ is presently codified. Given the global shift towards more rehabilitative and victim-centric approaches in criminal justice, a thorough analysis of Indonesia's implementation and regulatory challenges for RJ is timely and valuable. The findings reveal that Indonesia has indeed established a regulatory foundation for restorative justice, recognizing it both as an approach to crime resolution and a distinct legal process. The abstract meticulously lists several key regulations, including Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 on the Criminal Justice System, alongside specific implementing regulations from the Police (Perkapolri Nomor 8 Tahun 2021), Prosecution (Perja Nomor 15 Tahun 2020), and Judiciary (Perma Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 and Nomor 1 Tahun 2024). This demonstrates a multi-agency recognition and integration of RJ. Crucially, the research identifies a significant gap: despite the existence of these various regulations, there is an urgent need for harmonization of their material and formal requirements to ensure a systematically coherent and unified legal framework. The paper’s core contribution lies in its clear articulation of the necessity for regulatory harmonization. While acknowledging the progress made in establishing RJ provisions, the identification of potential inconsistencies in "syarat matriil dan formiil" (material and formal requirements) across different instruments points to a critical area requiring immediate policy attention. The full paper would ideally delve deeper into specific examples of these disparities and their practical implications on the effective and equitable application of restorative justice. Furthermore, exploring concrete mechanisms or strategies for achieving this proposed harmonization would significantly enhance the paper's practical utility. Nevertheless, this research provides a strong foundation for advocating for a more unified and effective implementation of restorative justice in Indonesia, thereby strengthening the criminal justice system as a whole.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.