Peter Baumann

Marx and the Missing Theory of Ideology

Introduction

Marx and the missing theory of ideology. Explore Karl Marx's scattered ideas on ideology: superstructure, ruling ideas, and false consciousness. This analysis argues Marx lacked a developed theory, suggesting modern approaches are needed.

Abstract

Karl Marx is often and typically seen as one of the main theorists of ideology. However, a closer look shows that Marx does not offer anything like a developed theory of ideology. Rather, there are, as I argue here, elements for 3 quite different accounts of ideology to be found in his work: ideology as superstructure, as the rulers’ ruling ideas, and as false consciousness. This is a new reconstruction of Marx’ ideas about ideology. None of the above 3 ideas has been developed in any greater detail by Marx, and there is even the open question whether they are mutually compatible. There might be some hope to combine the second and the third idea but I argue that anyone interested in a theory of ideology should rather look into more recent developments. It turns out that such a theory is still very much in its ‘infancy’.

Review

The paper, "Marx and the Missing Theory of Ideology," boldly challenges a foundational assumption within social and political thought: that Karl Marx offers a comprehensive theory of ideology. Far from presenting a unified or developed framework, the author contends that Marx's work actually contains only nascent elements for three distinct, and potentially incompatible, conceptions of ideology: as superstructure, as the ruling ideas of the ruling class, and as false consciousness. This reconstruction positions itself as a novel and critical re-evaluation of Marx's contribution to this crucial theoretical domain. A key strength of this paper lies in its incisive analytical approach, which dissects Marx's scattered thoughts on ideology into discernible, yet underdeveloped, strands. By highlighting the lack of elaboration for each concept and, more significantly, questioning their mutual compatibility, the author provides a compelling argument against the common attribution of a singular "Marxist theory of ideology." The abstract's observation that combining the "ruling ideas" and "false consciousness" elements might offer some promise is intriguing, though the author ultimately steers readers towards contemporary developments, suggesting Marx's contribution, while foundational, is insufficient for a robust modern theory. Overall, this paper promises to be a significant intervention, prompting scholars to reconsider the very bedrock of ideology theory. By meticulously demonstrating the "missing" developed theory in Marx, it not only reframes our understanding of his intellectual legacy but also implicitly calls for a more rigorous and self-conscious development of ideology theory in contemporary discourse. The conclusion that such a theory is still in its "infancy" serves as both a critique of historical scholarship and a powerful impetus for future theoretical work, making this a highly valuable contribution for anyone engaged in critical theory, political philosophy, and the study of ideology.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.