Miquel Julià Pijoan

La implementación del derecho a comprender las resoluciones judiciales mediante la inteligencia artificial: límites y oportunidades

Introduction

La implementación del derecho a comprender las resoluciones judiciales mediante la inteligencia artificial: límites y oportunidades. Explora el derecho a comprender resoluciones judiciales y cómo la IA puede mejorar su claridad. Analiza sus límites y oportunidades para una justicia más accesible.

Abstract

El presente trabajo ofrece un análisis crítico del derecho a comprender las resoluciones judiciales. Tras dicho examen, se identifican diversos ámbitos en los cuales la inteligencia artificial podría resultar útil para hacer efectivo este derecho, sin que su garantía suponga una carga adicional para los órganos jurisdiccionales. En particular, se examina cómo esta tecnología puede contribuir a corregir las deficiencias lingüísticas y estructurales presentes en algunas resoluciones judiciales, así como el modo en que los resúmenes generados mediante inteligencia artificial generativa pueden facilitar su comprensión por parte de los destinatarios.

Review

The submitted work, "La implementación del derecho a comprender las resoluciones judiciales mediante la inteligencia artificial: límites y oportunidades," addresses a highly pertinent and contemporary issue at the intersection of law and technology. The paper critically examines the fundamental right to comprehend judicial decisions, a cornerstone of accessible justice, and proposes the innovative application of artificial intelligence (AI) as a means to uphold this right. This focus on practical solutions to enhance judicial transparency and public understanding positions the article as a timely and valuable contribution to legal scholarship. A significant strength evident from the abstract is the dual approach taken: first, a critical analysis of the legal right itself, and second, a clear identification of specific areas where AI can offer tangible benefits. The abstract particularly highlights AI's potential to rectify linguistic and structural deficiencies in judicial rulings and the utility of generative AI for producing easily digestible summaries. This targeted exploration of AI's capabilities suggests a pragmatic outlook, aiming to make justice more accessible without imposing an undue burden on judicial bodies. The paper's explicit mention of reducing additional workload for courts is a practical consideration that enhances the appeal of its proposed solutions. While the abstract effectively outlines the promising opportunities presented by AI, the paper's full value will undoubtedly hinge on a robust exploration of the "límites" (limits) mentioned in its title. A comprehensive review should delve into critical considerations such as the ethical implications of AI in judicial processes, potential biases embedded in algorithms, data privacy concerns, the challenge of maintaining legal accuracy and nuance in AI-generated summaries, and the ultimate accountability for AI-assisted outputs. A thorough discussion of these potential pitfalls and how they might be mitigated would significantly strengthen the paper's contribution, offering a balanced and realistic perspective on AI implementation in such a sensitive domain. Nevertheless, the abstract promises a thought-provoking analysis, and the full paper is poised to stimulate important dialogue in both legal and technological fields.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.