Leila Belkaim

La dynamique nominative féminine en littérature : analyse onomastique

Introduction

La dynamique nominative féminine en littérature : analyse onomastique. Explorez la dynamique des noms de personnages féminins en littérature. Analyse onomastique révélant la perception de la féminité, le pouvoir et la violence dans le discours littéraire, notamment chez Yasmina Khadra.

Abstract

La littérature a de tout temps constitué un reflet des sociétés et un vecteur clé d’expression des représentations sociales, politiques et culturelles. La voie la plus représentative de cet art est l’attribution des noms aux personnages féminins qui se distingue comme un élément puissant qui laisse voir non seulement la perception de la féminité, mais aussi les dynamiques de pouvoir sous-jacents et la violence qu’il véhicule. L’objectif de notre travail est d’explorer la dynamique nominative des personnages féminins chez Yasmina Khadra dans son roman Qu’attendent les singes, (2014), en mettant en lumière la relation entre le nom propre et l’émergence de la violence dans le discours littéraire et ses implications culturelles. La question du nom propre est au centre de tout débat qui engage le discours littéraire. Quelle est le rapport entre l’écriture et le nom propre ? Une telle question suppose une relation étroite entre le nom et l’écrivain

Review

This paper proposes an intriguing and timely analysis at the intersection of literary studies, onomastics, and gender dynamics. It posits that the naming of female characters in literature serves as a powerful indicator of societal perceptions of femininity, underlying power structures, and the violence they often convey. The stated objective is to specifically explore these "nominative dynamics" within Yasmina Khadra's novel, *Qu’attendent les singes*, by examining the precise relationship between proper names and the emergence of violence within the literary discourse, along with its cultural implications. This focus on the proper name as a central element for literary debate and a reflection of the author's intent is a compelling starting point. The choice of Yasmina Khadra, a renowned author known for tackling complex societal and political themes, provides a fertile ground for such an investigation. The specific focus on the *nominative dynamics* offers a potentially fresh perspective on character analysis and authorial technique, particularly in relation to the pervasive themes of power and violence often found in Khadra's work. The research question, "What is the relationship between writing and the proper name?", is foundational and promises a deep exploration into the author-text connection through the lens of character naming, suggesting a rigorous engagement with the semiotics of names in literature. The interdisciplinary approach, blending literary criticism with the precision of onomastic analysis, is a clear strength. While the objective and scope are commendably clear, the abstract could benefit from a more explicit outline of the theoretical framework or the specific methodologies that will guide the onomastic analysis. Elucidating how "nominative dynamics" will be concretely measured or interpreted in relation to violence would significantly enhance the paper's methodological transparency. Furthermore, while a "close relationship between the name and the writer" is presumed, the full paper should elaborate on how this relationship will be demonstrated and what specific insights it is expected to yield regarding Khadra's authorial perspective or the broader cultural implications for representations of women and violence in contemporary literature. Expanding on these aspects will undoubtedly strengthen the paper's analytical rigor and its overall contribution to the field.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.