M. Nurul Huda, Andi Rahman

EPISTEMOLOGI METODE PENAFSIRAN AL-QUR’AN: DARI ERA NABI HINGGA ERA MAQA<S}IDI

Introduction

Epistemologi metode penafsiran al-qur’an: dari era nabi hingga era maqa<s}idi. Telusuri epistemologi metode penafsiran Al-Qur'an dari era Nabi hingga Maqasidi. Analisis dinamisasi, pergeseran sumber & keabsahan metode seiring zaman.

Abstract

Perkembangan metode penafsiran Al-Qur’an sangat penting dilihat sebagai khazanah yang menempatkan Al-Qur’an sesuai pada konteks zamannya. Sebab metode terus dinamis semenjak Nabi Muhammad wafat pada abad ke 7 M, dan terus terjadi sampai sekarang. Pada era Nabi, ia menjadi sumber tafsir Al-Qur’an tunggal, kemudian di era sahabat, baru terjadi perbedaan penafsiran akibat perbedaan metode yang digunakan untuk memahami suatu ayat yang sama. Peristiwa seperti ini masih terus terjadi sampai saat ini, dengan demikian menarik untuk dijadikan sebagai kajian akademik dengan mempertanyakan bagaimana metode penafsiran tersebut mengalami dinamisasi sesuai pada konteksnya? Riset ini hendak menganalisis dinamisasi tersebut dengan melibat perspektif kajian epistemologi. Melalui kajian kepustakaan (library research), riset ini berkesimpulan bahwa terdapat pergeseran secara mendasar dalam perkembangan metode penafsiran tersebut. Pertama, pergeseran dalam menggunakan sumber. Kedua, pergeseran juga terjadi terhadap penggunaan sumber metode itu sendiri. Ketiga, pergesertan pada keabsahan metode tersebut yang masing-masing hakikatnya lahir untuk keperluan temporal.

Review

The article, "EPISTEMOLOGI METODE PENAFSIRAN AL-QUR’AN: DARI ERA NABI HINGGA ERA MAQASIDI," proposes a highly relevant and ambitious inquiry into the evolution of Qur'anic interpretative methodologies. The abstract effectively highlights the crucial need to view these methods as a dynamic scholarly treasury, constantly adapting to historical and contextual shifts since the Prophet's era. The central research question, probing how interpretation methods have dynamized in accordance with their respective contexts, is well-articulated and sets a clear objective for the study. The commitment to analyze this dynamism through an epistemological lens promises a rigorous and insightful contribution to the field of Qur'anic studies. Employing a qualitative library research methodology (kajian kepustakaan), the study aims to trace the fundamental shifts in these interpretative approaches. The abstract succinctly presents three core findings: a foundational shift in the sources utilized for interpretation, a subsequent shift in the very sources from which the interpretative methods themselves are derived, and finally, a dynamic evolution in the legitimacy or validity of these methods, each purportedly emerging to address specific temporal requirements. These conclusions suggest a nuanced understanding of how *tafsir* adapts, moving beyond a simple chronological account to address the underlying rationale and philosophical underpinnings of methodological change. While the abstract lays out a compelling framework and interesting conclusions, the strength of the full paper will ultimately lie in the depth of its execution. For instance, the abstract mentions an "epistemological perspective" but doesn't elaborate on the specific theories or frameworks it will employ within this lens. Similarly, while library research is a valid methodology, the abstract could hint at the specific types of primary and secondary sources it will engage with to substantiate its claims, particularly in demonstrating the "shifts in validity" and the "temporal necessities." A more detailed roadmap on how the study will rigorously connect its historical observations to its epistemological conclusions, potentially with illustrative examples of these shifts across different eras, would significantly enhance the paper's impact and solidify its contribution to understanding the adaptable nature of Qur'anic exegesis.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.