Lalu ariyadi saputra, RR. Cahyowati, Khairul Umam

EFEKTIVITAS SISTEM PENGAWASAN VISA ON ARRIVAL (VOA) DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG KEIMIGRASIAN (Studi di Kantor Imigrasi Mataram)

Introduction

Efektivitas sistem pengawasan visa on arrival (voa) di indonesia berdasarkan undang-undang nomor 6 tahun 2011 tentang keimigrasian (studi di kantor imigrasi mataram). Menilai efektivitas pengawasan Visa on Arrival (VoA) di Imigrasi Mataram berdasarkan UU No. 6 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian, menyoroti tantangan & solusi.

Abstract

Imigrasi terhadap Visa on Arrival (VoA) di Wilayah Kantor Imigrasi Mataram Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian. mengetahui faktor penghambat dan solusi dari pelaksanaan penegakkan hukum melalui Pengawasan Keimigrasian terhadap Warga Negara Asing terkait Visa on Arrival (VoA) di Wilayah Kantor Imigrasi Mataram. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan sosiologis. Data dikumpulkan melalui pertanyaan singkat melalui kuesioner dan wawancara dengan pihak terkait dalam hal ini pejabat Kantor Imiigrasi Mataram. Dalam penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa mekanisme pengawasan keimigrasian telah berjalan sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang nomor 6 tahun 2011 tentang keimigrasian akan tetapi masih ada tantangan dalam hal deteksi dini dan pelanggaran seperti overstay. Faktor utama yang menghambat efektivitas pengawasan VoA di Kantor Imigrasi Mataram meliputi keterbatasan personel keimigrasian, kurang optimalnya penggunaan teknologi informasi dalam sistem pengawasan, serta masih adanya celah dalam pengawasan di beberapa titik masuk wilayah yang menjadi pintu masuk wisatawan asing. Pemerintah harus melakukan revisi dan penegasan kembali terkait batasan aktivitas serta larangan bagi wisatawan asing pemegang VoA. Kantor Imigrasi Mataram perlu melakukan peningkatan kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM) khususnya anggota TIMPORA melalui pelatihan khusus terkait profiling WNA. Selain itu, Pejabat Kantor Imigrasi Mataram harus membuat program sosialisasi untuk menjelaskan manfaat dari APOA dalam melakukan pengawasan terhadap orang asing serta memberikan panduan praktis mengenai penggunaan aplikasi.

Review

This paper, "EFEKTIVITAS SISTEM PENGAWASAN VISA ON ARRIVAL (VOA) DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG KEIMIGRASIAN (Studi di Kantor Imigrasi Mataram)," undertakes a pertinent examination of the effectiveness of the Visa on Arrival (VoA) supervision system in Indonesia, specifically focusing on the Mataram Immigration Office. Given the increasing global mobility and the strategic importance of tourist destinations, understanding the efficacy of immigration controls like VoA supervision is crucial for national security, economic stability, and maintaining regulatory compliance. The study aims to not only assess the current operational effectiveness of the VoA supervision mechanism as mandated by Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration but also to identify the underlying inhibiting factors and propose actionable solutions to enhance law enforcement in this critical area. Employing an empirical legal research methodology with a sociological approach, the study gathered data through questionnaires and interviews conducted with relevant officials at the Mataram Immigration Office. This mixed-method approach provides a practical and grounded understanding of the daily operational challenges. The findings reveal that while the existing immigration supervision mechanism largely adheres to the provisions of Law Number 6 of 2011, it is significantly hampered by ongoing challenges related to early detection of potential issues and the prevalence of violations such as overstay. The research meticulously identifies key inhibiting factors, including the evident limitations in immigration personnel, the suboptimal utilization of information technology within the surveillance system, and the persistent presence of loopholes in supervision at various entry points for foreign tourists. The study culminates in a set of practical and policy-oriented recommendations that hold significant implications for strengthening immigration control. It urges the government to review and re-emphasize the permissible activities and prohibitions for foreign tourists holding VoA. Furthermore, specific to the Mataram Immigration Office, the paper advocates for enhancing the quality of human resources, particularly through specialized profiling training for members of TIMPORA (Team for Supervision of Foreigners). Crucially, it highlights the need for immigration officials to actively promote and provide practical guidance on the use of the APOA application, an important tool for supervising foreigners. Overall, this research provides valuable insights into the operational realities of VoA supervision and offers a clear roadmap for improving its effectiveness, thereby contributing meaningfully to both academic understanding and policy development in Indonesian immigration law.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.