dara tri nurhikmayati, Idi Amin, Taufan Taufan

UPAYA KEPOLISIAN DALAM MENANGGULANGI TINDAK PIDANA PEREDARAN UANG PALSU

Introduction

Upaya kepolisian dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana peredaran uang palsu. Pelajari upaya kepolisian, hambatan, & integrasi kelembagaan dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana peredaran uang palsu di Mataram. Analisis preventif & represif.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui upaya kepolisian dalam menanggulangi, memahami hambatan kepolisian, dan integrasi kelembagaan dalam menanggulangi tindak pidana peredaran uang palsu di Kota Mataram. Jenis penelitian digunakan penelitian hukum empiris, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan sosiologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan upaya penanggulangan tindak pidana peredaran uang palsu, dengan upaya preventif berupa edukasi antara Kepolisian dengan Bank Indonesia dan represif melalui peradilan pidana. Hambatan Polresta Mataram meliputi faktor penegak hukum kurangnya sumber daya manusia, faktor sarana dan fasilitas yang dimiliki masih standar, serta faktor masyarakat yang masih perlunya kesadaran hukum. Integrasi kelembagaan, kepolisian bekerja sama dengan Bank Indonesia melakukan upaya preventif maupun represif.

Review

This paper presents a timely and relevant investigation into the efforts of the police in combating counterfeit currency crimes, specifically within Mataram City. The objectives are clearly articulated: to identify police strategies, understand the inherent obstacles faced by law enforcement, and examine the institutional integration crucial for successful prevention and prosecution. Employing an empirical legal research methodology, the study adopts a comprehensive approach, integrating statutory, conceptual, and sociological perspectives. This multi-faceted design promises a holistic understanding of a critical issue that has significant economic and societal implications. The findings summarized in the abstract provide valuable insights into current practices. Police efforts are bifurcated into preventive measures, such as educational initiatives conducted in collaboration with Bank Indonesia, and repressive actions through the criminal justice system. The study effectively identifies key impediments faced by the Mataram Police, including human resource deficiencies, substandard facilities, and a persistent lack of legal awareness within the community. Crucially, the research underscores the importance of institutional integration, highlighting the cooperative framework between the police and Bank Indonesia in both proactive prevention and reactive enforcement. Overall, the abstract suggests a well-structured study that directly addresses a pressing law enforcement challenge. Its strength lies in its practical focus and the identification of concrete obstacles and collaborative strategies. For a more profound impact, the full paper would ideally elaborate on the specific methodologies employed in evaluating the *effectiveness* of the preventive and repressive measures, perhaps through quantitative metrics or case studies. Further detail on how the 'statutory' and 'conceptual' approaches shaped the nuanced understanding of the problem and its solutions would also enrich the contribution, moving beyond a descriptive account to offer more prescriptive policy recommendations derived from the empirical data.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.