Reni Dwita Putri, Lilis Suryani, Nurjannah Harahap, Husnatul Hamidiyyah, Riko Andrian

TRANSFORMASI ILMU DILALAH DAN ILMU MU'JAM DALAM LINGUISTIK ARAB: ANALISIS KRITIS PENDEKATAN KLASIK DAN KONTEMPORER DALAM PERSPEKTIF HISTORIS

Introduction

Transformasi ilmu dilalah dan ilmu mu'jam dalam linguistik arab: analisis kritis pendekatan klasik dan kontemporer dalam perspektif historis. Transformasi Ilmu Dilalah (semantik) & Ilmu Mu'jam (leksikografi) dalam linguistik Arab. Analisis kritis pendekatan klasik-kontemporer, mengungkap evolusi & hubungannya.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the historical development of Ilm al-Dilālah (semantics) and Ilm al-Mu'jam (lexicography) within the Arabic linguistic tradition, and to identify the epistemological relationship between the two disciplines from the classical to the contemporary era. A qualitative method with a historical-analytical-comparative approach was employed through library research. Data were collected from primary sources comprising classical Arabic linguistic texts and secondary sources including relevant academic journals and books, then analyzed using a descriptive-analytical method. The findings reveal that Ilm al-Dilālah evolved from meaning analysis rooted in the need to understand sacred texts during the classical era into a multidisciplinary field encompassing cognitive, computational, and neuro-semantics in the contemporary period. Meanwhile, Ilm al-Mu'jam developed from phonetics-based and root-based lexicographic systems in its early stages, through root-based classical dictionaries, to alphabetical and digital systems in the modern era, including its development in Indonesia through Arabic-Malay to multilingual digital dictionaries. This study concludes that Ilm al-Dilālah and Ilm al-Mu'jam share a close epistemological relationship: semantic theory of meaning provides the theoretical foundation for definitional systems in lexicography, making both disciplines mutually complementary as central pillars in the preservation, comprehension, and development of the Arabic language.

Review

The paper, titled "TRANSFORMASI ILMU DILALAH DAN ILMU MU'JAM DALAM LINGUISTIK ARAB: ANALISIS KRITIS PENDEKATAN KLASIK DAN KONTEMPORER DALAM PERSPEKTIF HISTORIS," presents a highly relevant and ambitious exploration into two foundational disciplines of Arabic linguistics: *Ilm al-Dilālah* (semantics) and *Ilm al-Mu'jam* (lexicography). By charting their historical evolution from the classical to the contemporary era and identifying their epistemological relationship, the study promises a nuanced understanding of how meaning and vocabulary have been conceptualized and managed throughout the rich tradition of Arabic linguistic thought. The historical-analytical-comparative approach is particularly valuable for bridging historical scholarship with modern linguistic inquiry, offering insights into both continuity and transformation. Employing a robust qualitative methodology, the research effectively leverages library-based methods to gather data from both primary classical Arabic linguistic texts and a range of secondary academic sources. The findings compellingly demonstrate the significant evolution within *Ilm al-Dilālah*, moving from its early focus on sacred text interpretation to its current multidisciplinary engagement with cognitive, computational, and neuro-semantics. Similarly, *Ilm al-Mu'jam* is shown to have progressed from early phonetic and root-based systems to sophisticated alphabetical and digital dictionaries, notably including its localized development in Indonesia. Crucially, the study articulates a clear epistemological link, asserting that semantic theory provides the theoretical foundation for definitional systems in lexicography, thus positioning both disciplines as interdependent and mutually complementary. This study makes a significant contribution to the understanding of Arabic linguistics by meticulously tracing the intellectual genealogies of semantics and lexicography and highlighting their intrinsic connection. By positioning *Ilm al-Dilālah* and *Ilm al-Mu'jam* as central pillars in the preservation, comprehension, and development of the Arabic language, the paper not only enriches academic discourse but also underscores the enduring relevance of classical scholarship to contemporary linguistic challenges. The breadth of the historical scope and the identification of the epistemological relationship offer a valuable framework for scholars seeking to appreciate the dynamism and interconnectedness of Arabic linguistic sciences, providing a solid foundation for future studies into specific transformations or regional developments.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.