Muhammad Hafizi, Luqmanul Hakim, Efrinaldi

Tracing Truth : A Critical Study on the Authenticity of the Hadiths in Al-Bayan by Abdul Hamid Hakim (1893 M-1959 M)

Introduction

Tracing truth : a critical study on the authenticity of the hadiths in al-bayan by abdul hamid hakim (1893 m-1959 m). Critically studies Hadith authenticity in Abdul Hamid Hakim's Al-Bayan using takhrij al-hadith. Uncover legal status & methodological rigor of 165 Hadiths. Essential for Islamic jurisprudence.

Abstract

This research focuses on the problem of unclear hadith authentication and legal classification in Al-Bayan by Abdul Hamid Hakim, where many hadiths are cited without explanation of their sanad or legal status. Such absence of references raises questions about the methodological rigor and reliability of the hadiths used as istidlal (legal arguments). The study employs a qualitative method with a literature study approach, emphasizing takhrij al-hadith to trace the origins, authenticity, and legal implications of the hadiths. Through comparative analysis, the research identifies 165 hadiths, of which 129 are excluded because their rulings are clear and authenticated by al-Bukhari and Muslim, while 36 require further takhrij. From 103 hadiths analyzed in detail, 6 are hasan, 9 are da‘if, and the rest are sahih. The findings show that Abdul Hamid Hakim’s interpretive approach integrates the Qur’an, hadith, qiyas, and scholarly consensus, prioritizing moral and legal coherence over technical precision.

Review

This research, "Tracing Truth: A Critical Study on the Authenticity of the Hadiths in Al-Bayan by Abdul Hamid Hakim," presents a critical and timely examination of methodological rigor within a significant Islamic scholarly work. The study adeptly identifies a crucial problem: the lack of clear authentication and legal classification for numerous hadiths cited in Abdul Hamid Hakim's *Al-Bayan*, which consequently raises legitimate concerns about the reliability of these narrations when used as *istidlal*. By framing the problem around methodological gaps, the paper establishes a compelling rationale for its inquiry, promising to enhance the scholarly value and trustworthiness of *Al-Bayan* through systematic analysis. The methodology employed is robust and well-suited to the research question. The qualitative approach, emphasizing a literature study and meticulous *takhrij al-hadith*, demonstrates a commitment to foundational Islamic critical scholarship. The staged analytical process, initially identifying 165 hadiths, then excluding 129 with clear rulings, and finally conducting detailed *takhrij* on 36 (leading to 103 analyzed), reflects a disciplined and efficient workflow. The specific findings—classifying 6 hadiths as *hasan*, 9 as *da‘if*, and the rest as *sahih*—provide concrete results that directly address the core problem. Crucially, the study's conclusion regarding Abdul Hamid Hakim's interpretive approach, which prioritizes moral and legal coherence through the integration of various sources over strict technical precision in hadith citation, offers a profound and nuanced understanding of the scholar's methodology. Overall, this study makes a significant contribution to Islamic scholarship by systematically clarifying the authenticity and legal status of hadiths within a prominent text. By meticulously applying the principles of *takhrij al-hadith*, the authors not only provide much-needed clarity on specific narrations but also offer valuable insights into the broader interpretive framework of Abdul Hamid Hakim. This research serves as an exemplary model for critical engagement with classical Islamic texts, enhancing their academic utility and providing a foundation for future studies. It not only rectifies potential methodological ambiguities in *Al-Bayan* but also enriches our understanding of how prominent scholars synthesized diverse sources to achieve moral and legal coherence in their jurisprudence.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.