Proceedings

Published HIAT'22 proceedings

Introduction

Published hiat'22 proceedings. Access the official published proceedings of HIAT'22. Dive into a comprehensive collection of research papers and presentations from the conference.

Abstract

Review

This submission, titled "Published HIAT'22 proceedings," presents a unique challenge for review as it appears to function more as an announcement or a metadata entry rather than a traditional research article. The title itself suggests that the proceedings from the HIAT'22 conference have already been published, implying this submission might serve to formally register or declare that fact within the journal's system or as a brief informational note. However, without further context, its intended role within the journal's scope remains ambiguous. A critical deficiency that immediately precludes any substantive review is the complete absence of an abstract. An abstract is an indispensable component of any scholarly publication, designed to provide a concise summary of the article's content, purpose, methodology, key findings, and conclusions. Its absence renders it impossible for reviewers, editorial staff, or potential readers to ascertain the scope, relevance, or academic merit of the submission. In its current form, there is simply no content to evaluate from a scientific or scholarly perspective, making it fundamentally unreviewable against standard journal criteria. Consequently, this submission cannot be processed as a standard journal article. The submitter must clarify the intended purpose of this entry. If it is meant to be an actual article—such as an editorial introduction to the proceedings, a summary of the conference, or a report on its outcomes—then it requires a full abstract, a proper introduction, body content, and a clear academic structure. If its purpose is purely to serve as a reference or a link to proceedings published elsewhere, then the journal's specific guidelines for such entries (e.g., conference announcements, editorial notes) should be followed, which would still typically require a brief descriptive abstract and, ideally, a persistent identifier (like a DOI) for the actual proceedings. As it stands, it must be rejected and resubmitted with appropriate content and clarification.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.