Orietta Abbati

Paolo Collo, Il mio nome è legione. Fernando Pessoa e gli Altri

Introduction

Paolo collo, il mio nome è legione. Fernando pessoa e gli altri. Recensione del volume di Paolo Collo 'Il mio nome è legione', che esplora Fernando Pessoa e i suoi celebri eteronimi. Approfondisci l'opera.

Abstract

Reseña del volumen.

Review

This submission, titled "Paolo Collo, Il mio nome è legione. Fernando Pessoa e gli Altri," is presented as a "Reseña del volumen," indicating that the article itself is a review of a book by Paolo Collo. The book's title immediately signals a focus on the renowned Portuguese poet Fernando Pessoa, specifically engaging with his complex identity and the concept of heteronymy, as suggested by the intriguing phrase "Il mio nome è legione" ("My name is Legion") and "Gli Altri" ("The Others"). The subject matter is undoubtedly of significant interest to scholars of modern literature, Pessoan studies, and literary theory concerning authorship and identity. However, the provided abstract, consisting solely of "Reseña del volumen," offers no substantive insight into the content or critical approach of the review article itself. A typical abstract for a scholarly review article would outline the main arguments or contributions of the book being reviewed, the key points of the reviewer's analysis, and perhaps the broader context of the discussion. In its current form, this abstract fails to inform potential readers about what aspects of Collo's work are addressed, the reviewer's perspective, or what contribution this review makes to the scholarly discourse surrounding Pessoa. It merely states its genre without any summary of its substance. Consequently, a meaningful evaluation of the review article based *only* on the provided information is impossible. While the subject matter—Fernando Pessoa's heteronyms—is inherently rich and deserving of critical attention, the abstract provides no basis to assess the quality, depth, or originality of the critical engagement offered within the article. For future submissions, it would be highly beneficial to expand the abstract to briefly summarize the book's central thesis and the reviewer's main points of critique or appreciation, thereby allowing readers to understand the article's scope and potential value.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.