Author

On the identity of poetry and language

Introduction

On the identity of poetry and language. This article delves into the profound identity of poetry and language, arguing that they are fundamentally intertwined and inseparable forms of human expression.

Abstract

Review

The title, "On the identity of poetry and language," immediately signals an ambitious and profound inquiry into a foundational question at the intersection of literary studies, linguistics, and philosophy. It promises a deep dive into the ontological relationship between these two fundamental human phenomena, inviting a re-evaluation of their boundaries, functions, and very essence. Such a paper could offer significant theoretical contributions to our understanding of communication, aesthetic expression, and the nature of meaning itself, potentially challenging established disciplinary divisions and sparking considerable intellectual debate within the humanities. Without the benefit of an abstract, it is challenging to ascertain the specific arguments, theoretical framework, or methodological approach employed by the author. One might anticipate an exploration of how language, in its most fundamental form, inherently contains poetic potential, or conversely, how poetry serves as language's most intense, self-reflexive manifestation. The paper could draw upon various traditions, from structuralism and post-structuralism to phenomenology or cognitive linguistics, to articulate its thesis. The success of such an endeavor would hinge on the clarity of its definitions and the rigor with which it navigates the complex interplay of linguistic structure, semantic content, and aesthetic function. While the title alone sparks considerable intellectual curiosity, a comprehensive assessment of the article's originality, contribution, and methodological soundness is severely constrained by the absence of an abstract. A proper review would need to evaluate whether the paper successfully articulates a novel perspective on this long-debated topic, provides compelling evidence or argumentation, and effectively addresses potential counter-arguments. Without insight into the core arguments, empirical basis (if any), and conclusions, it is impossible to critique the study's impact, identify its key strengths, or suggest areas for improvement. A detailed review would therefore require access to the summary of its substantive content.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.