Lynette Olson

The Conversion of the Visigoths and Bulgarians Compared

Introduction

The conversion of the visigoths and bulgarians compared. Explore the historical comparison of Visigothic and Bulgarian conversions to Christianity. Analyze religious dynamics, papal warnings, and Greek influence.

Abstract

This paper is written to bring out various themes relevant to the subject of this book. It is not the first time such a comparison has been made, for in the ninth century A.D., Pope John VIII warned the Bulgar ruler not to get his Christianity from the Greek’s, who 500 years earlier had consecrated a heretical bishop for the Visigoths.

Review

This paper proposes an intriguing comparative study of the conversions of the Visigoths and Bulgarians, a topic with significant implications for understanding early medieval religious and political developments. The historical anecdote cited, concerning Pope John VIII's warning against Greek influence on the Bulgarians due to past Visigothic experiences with "heretical" bishops, immediately highlights a specific area of historical inquiry: the interplay of theological disputes, ecclesiastical authority, and ethnic identity in the process of conversion. The scope of comparing two distinct groups across several centuries, under potentially differing geopolitical and theological pressures, holds the promise of revealing nuanced patterns in the spread of Christianity. However, the provided abstract falls significantly short of the standard expected for a scholarly submission. While the title clearly states a comparative aim, the abstract fails to articulate the paper's central argument, specific research questions, or the methodological approach beyond simply "bringing out various themes." The reference to being "relevant to the subject of this book" suggests it may be a chapter or contribution to a collection, but even in that context, a more robust summary of the paper's unique contribution is essential. Crucially, it does not outline the scope of the comparison—what aspects of conversion (e.g., political, social, theological, chronological) will be examined—nor does it preview any specific findings or conclusions. For this paper to effectively communicate its value, a substantially revised abstract is necessary. It should clearly state the paper's thesis, outline the specific dimensions of the Visigothic and Bulgarian conversions that will be compared, and articulate the methodology employed. Furthermore, it needs to explicitly state the paper's main contribution to existing scholarship. While the historical detail about Pope John VIII offers a promising glimpse into the paper's focus, the abstract as a whole currently provides insufficient information for a reviewer or reader to assess the depth, originality, or significance of the work.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.