Thomas Jovanovski

Nietzsche’s Pale Criminal Identified

Introduction

Nietzsche’s pale criminal identified . Uncover the identity of Nietzsche's Pale Criminal from Thus Spoke Zarathustra. This analysis links the enigmatic figure to Nietzsche's "killers of God" and provides new insights into his motives and its relevance to his overall work.

Abstract

As he does in most of his books, in Thus Spoke Zarathustra Nietzsche is unfolding his dedicated resistance to established social standards and moral tenets, though in some sections therein in somewhat less than a clearly developed thematic progression. Thus, early in Part I of Zarathustra, we come across a speech by the eponymous character, titled “On the Pale Criminal,” whose locus and relevance to the rest of the text seem to have perplexed every generation of students of Nietzsche’s oeuvre since its initial appearance in print (in 1883). A closer reading of the speech, however, should reveal that the speech’s main character, an (unidentified male) pale-complected criminal, who is about to be condemned to death for the capital crime of murder, is not as incongruous as he might seem at first blush — to the rest of the book or to the world of characters we meet later in Zarathustra or in any of Nietzsche’s other texts. Once we correctly identify the reason for his pale complexion, we might more easily determine his motives as well as the identity of his victim. Once, in turn, we grasp these elements, we notice that the criminal is really a personification of Nietzsche’s two other (self-declared) killers of God, namely, the madman, in the Gay Science, and the inexpressible one, the ugliest man, in Part IV of Zarathustra.

Review

This paper, "Nietzsche’s Pale Criminal Identified," tackles a perennial challenge within Nietzsche studies: the enigmatic figure of the "Pale Criminal" from *Thus Spoke Zarathustra*. The abstract posits that this character, whose relevance has reportedly "perplexed every generation of students" since its 1883 appearance, is far from incongruous once his motives and victim are correctly understood through a "closer reading." The central claim is highly ambitious: to identify the criminal as a personification of Nietzsche’s other self-declared "killers of God" – specifically, the madman from *The Gay Science* and the ugliest man from *Zarathustra* Part IV. Should this identification prove convincing, it promises a significant reinterpretation of a crucial, yet often isolated, passage in Nietzsche's work. The strength of this submission lies in its direct engagement with a specific textual enigma within Nietzsche's oeuvre. By focusing on the "Pale Criminal" speech, the author highlights a section that, as noted, often leaves readers questioning its place and purpose within the broader text and Nietzsche's philosophy. The proposed method of a "closer reading" to uncover the significance of the criminal's paleness, motives, and victim suggests a rigorous textual analysis. Furthermore, the abstract's promise to connect this figure to the madman and the ugliest man offers a compelling opportunity to demonstrate thematic continuities and the unfolding of Nietzsche's critique of established morality across different texts and characters. Such an intertextual approach could significantly deepen our understanding of Nietzsche's sustained "resistance to established social standards and moral tenets." While the abstract outlines a highly intriguing hypothesis, the success of this paper will hinge entirely on the strength and detail of the textual evidence and argumentation presented. The author must convincingly demonstrate *how* the "closer reading" reveals the specific reasons for the criminal's pallor, his precise motives, and the identity of his victim, rather than merely asserting these revelations. Crucially, the argument linking the Pale Criminal to the madman and the ugliest man as "personifications" of God-killers will require meticulous conceptual and textual substantiation. The paper should not only identify the criminal but also clarify how this identification illuminates the "locus and relevance" of the speech within the broader arc of *Zarathustra*, potentially offering new insights into Nietzsche's broader philosophical project and his understanding of human responsibility in a post-God world. This paper holds considerable promise for advancing Nietzsche scholarship, provided its bold claims are robustly supported.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.