Isworo Indriati, Sudijono Sastroatmodjo, Wahyudin Wahyudin, Udy Wachyudi, Angga Rizky P

Management of Integrity Zone Data Information System in Higher Education

Introduction

Management of integrity zone data information system in higher education. Develop an Integrity Zone data information system model for higher education to prevent corruption, improve public services, and support WBK/WBBM programs.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish a data information system model for the Integrity Zone in higher education. ZI (Integrity Zone) is a predicate given to agencies/institutions whose administrators and staff are involved in realizing Corruption-Free Area (WBK) and Clean Serving Bureaucratic Area (WBBM) at the central and regional levels. One of the government agencies/institutions that implements the ZI WBK and WBBM programs is UNNES Faculty of Law. The research method using the access system approach and system development is an efficient way to solve the problems that started by identifying a number of requirements to create an efficient and functional application. However, the system development process includes several tasks that can be divided into several steps. With the discovery of System Governance has not been implemented properly. The presence of ZI at UNNES Faculty of Law can be realized through bureaucratic reform, especially in terms of preventing and improving corruption problem and quality of public services. WBK stands for Corruption-Free Area. WBBM stands for Clean Serving Bureaucratic Area. WBBM is a predicate given to work units that fulfils most of the five WBK programs, and a program to strengthen the quality of public services.

Review

This study tackles a highly relevant and critical issue: the management of integrity zone data information systems within higher education, specifically aiming to establish a model for the Integrity Zone (ZI). The focus on realizing Corruption-Free Area (WBK) and Clean Serving Bureaucratic Area (WBBM) in institutions like UNNES Faculty of Law is commendable, addressing a significant concern for governance and public trust. The abstract clearly identifies the core problem as inadequate system governance, setting the stage for the proposed solution, which centers on developing an efficient and functional data information system. However, the abstract's description of the methodology and the proposed model lacks sufficient detail. While it states using an "access system approach and system development," this phrase remains largely undefined, leaving the reader unclear about the specific frameworks, tools, or stages involved in creating the system. A significant portion of the abstract is dedicated to defining ZI, WBK, and WBBM, which, while providing essential context, takes away space that could be used to elaborate on the *actual* system model, its architecture, or the unique features designed to address the identified governance shortcomings. The abstract mentions "several tasks that can be divided into several steps" in the system development process but fails to enumerate or describe these steps, making it difficult to assess the methodological rigor. To enhance the clarity and impact of this work, the abstract would benefit from a more precise articulation of the proposed "data information system model." Future iterations should elaborate on the specific components, functionalities, and underlying technologies of the system, clearly demonstrating *how* it addresses the problem of improper system governance. Furthermore, a concise summary of the key findings or outcomes related to the *establishment* of this model, rather than just the intent, would significantly strengthen the abstract. By presenting more concrete details about the methodology and the resulting model, the abstract could more effectively convey the study's contribution to fostering integrity and improving public services in higher education.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.