Fabio G. NIGRA

El “nuevo periodismo”, la literatura y el cine histórico en la representación de la realidad

Introduction

El “nuevo periodismo”, la literatura y el cine histórico en la representación de la realidad . Descubre la intersección del nuevo periodismo, la literatura y el cine histórico en la compleja representación de la realidad social y cultural.

Abstract

El “nuevo periodismo”, la literatura y el cine histórico en la representación de la realidad. 

Review

The proposed article, "El “nuevo periodismo”, la literatura y el cine histórico en la representación de la realidad," presents an intriguing and potentially highly relevant interdisciplinary topic. The title alone suggests a comparative analysis of how three distinct yet often overlapping mediums—New Journalism, literature, and historical cinema—engage with and construct our understanding of reality. This scope promises a rich discussion on the interplay between factual reporting, fictionalization, historical interpretation, and the various narrative strategies employed across these forms to represent events, periods, and societal truths. The very notion of "representation of reality" within these contexts implies a critical examination of objectivity, subjectivity, and the blurred lines between fact and interpretation. However, a significant limitation in assessing this submission is the abstract itself, which is merely a repetition of the title. A functional abstract is crucial for any scholarly work, providing a concise summary of the article's purpose, methodology, key arguments, and expected contributions or findings. Without this essential information, it is impossible to gauge the article's specific focus, the theoretical frameworks it employs, the particular case studies or examples it might analyze, or the novelty of its insights. A robust abstract would delineate whether the article offers a theoretical synthesis, a comparative case study, a historical overview, or a critical deconstruction of representational practices within these three fields. Consequently, while the thematic territory outlined by the title is certainly fertile ground for academic inquiry, the lack of an informative abstract prevents any meaningful review of the article's substance or scholarly merit. To facilitate a proper evaluation, the author must provide a comprehensive abstract that outlines the specific research questions addressed, the methodological approach, the principal arguments developed, and the main conclusions drawn. This would enable reviewers to ascertain the article's contribution to existing scholarship on New Journalism, literary studies, film theory, and the broader discourse on the construction of reality.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.