mia fitriah elkarimah

DIALEKTIKA NASAKH-MANSUKH: PERSPEKTIF TRADISIONAL JALALUDDIN AS-SUYUTHI VERSUS HERMENEUTIK-MODERN MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR

Introduction

Dialektika nasakh-mansukh: perspektif tradisional jalaluddin as-suyuthi versus hermeneutik-modern muhammad syahrur. Eksplorasi dialektika nasakh-mansukh: perbandingan perspektif tradisional As-Suyuthi dan hermeneutik modern Syahrur. Analisis perbedaan penafsiran dan relevansi Al-Qur'an dalam pemikiran Islam.

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi dialektika konsep nasakh-mansukh melalui analisis komparatif pemikiran Muhammad Syahrur dan Jalaluddin As-Suyuthi, dua tokoh dengan pendekatan hermeneutik berbeda dalam memahami dinamika hukum Islam. Menggunakan metode kualitatif-komparatif dengan pendekatan studi pustaka, penelitian mendalami konstruksi epistemologis kedua pemikir dalam menafsirkan mekanisme nasakh dalam Al-Qur'an. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan perbedaan fundamental: Syahrur mengajukan pendekatan revolusioner dengan menolak total konsep nasakh internal, menawarkan hermeneutika kontekstual yang memandang setiap ayat memiliki relevansi berkelanjutan sepanjang zaman. Sebaliknya, Suyuthi mempertahankan metodologi klasik dengan menerima nasakh sebagai mekanisme syariat, namun dengan pembatasan ketat, mengklasifikasikan nasakh dalam tiga kategori dan membatasi jumlah ayat mansukh hingga sekitar 20 ayat. Analisis mendalam mengungkap bahwa meskipun metodologi mereka berbeda, keduanya sama-sama bertujuan menjaga koherensi dan relevansi Al-Qur'an, mencerminkan dinamika intelektual yang kompleks dalam tradisi pemikiran Islam. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pemahaman teks suci merupakan proses intelektual berkelanjutan yang membutuhkan keseimbangan antara kontekstualitas modern dan preservasi makna original, sekaligus menghadirkan ketegangan produktif antara tradisi dan pembaruan dalam kajian keislaman. Kata Kunci: Nasakh-Mansukh, Hermeneutika, Imam al-Suyuthi, Syahrur.

Review

The article, "DIALEKTIKA NASAKH-MANSUKH: PERSPEKTIF TRADISIONAL JALALUDDIN AS-SUYUTHI VERSUS HERMENEUTIK-MODERN MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR," offers a crucial comparative analysis of the concept of *nasakh-mansukh* (abrogation) within Islamic legal and hermeneutical traditions. Employing a qualitative-comparative methodology grounded in a comprehensive literature review, the research meticulously examines the epistemological underpinnings of two influential scholars: Jalaluddin As-Suyuthi, representing a traditional interpretive framework, and Muhammad Syahrur, who champions a modern hermeneutic. The primary objective is to elucidate their distinct approaches to understanding the mechanisms of *nasakh* in the Qur'an and the broader implications for Islamic jurisprudence. The study's findings reveal a fundamental divergence in their interpretive stances. Syahrur's approach is characterized as revolutionary, as he outright rejects the concept of internal *nasakh*, instead advocating for a contextual hermeneutic that asserts the continuous and enduring relevance of all Qur'anic verses throughout time. In contrast, As-Suyuthi adheres to a more classical methodology, accepting *nasakh* as a valid mechanism of divine legislation, but with stringent limitations; he categorizes *nasakh* into three types and significantly restricts the number of *mansukh* (abrogated) verses to around 20. Despite these profound methodological differences, the research sagaciously identifies a shared ultimate aim: both scholars are driven by a commitment to maintaining the coherence and perpetual relevance of the Qur'an, thereby illustrating the intricate intellectual dynamism within Islamic thought. This comparative investigation provides significant contributions to the ongoing discourse on Islamic hermeneutics and the interpretation of sacred texts. The article concludes that the comprehension of religious scripture is an incessant intellectual process, demanding a thoughtful equilibrium between modern contextual understanding and the preservation of original meanings. By effectively showcasing the "productive tension" between established tradition and contemporary renewal in Islamic studies, this research not only illuminates the distinct interpretive pathways of As-Suyuthi and Syahrur but also reaffirms the intellectual vitality required to engage with foundational religious concepts across diverse historical and intellectual landscapes.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.