Ulwan Taqi Laudza

Bibliometric Analysis of Work Life Balance on Employee Performance

Introduction

Bibliometric analysis of work life balance on employee performance. Bibliometric analysis of work-life balance on employee performance. Reviews 412 articles (2015-2025) to understand time & satisfaction balance, using Vosviewer insights.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to learn more about matters related to an employee's work and personal life, including work-life balance, time balance, and satisfaction balance. For the literature analysis in this study, the Science Direct database was used to screen articles published from 2015-2025 through a bibliometric study. 412 articles were found according to the predefined criteria with keywords such as work-life balance and health. Data were analyzed using Vosviewer. The results explain how to analyze Co-authorship, Co-occurrence, and Citation. It is hoped that this research will be useful for further research on the issue of work-life balance (also known as work-life balance).

Review

The paper "Bibliometric Analysis of Work Life Balance on Employee Performance" tackles a highly relevant and contemporary issue concerning the well-being and productivity of employees. The abstract positions the research as an exploration into the multifaceted aspects of work and personal life, specifically focusing on work-life balance, time balance, and satisfaction balance. Given the increasing recognition of the profound impact these factors have on individual flourishing and organizational success, a comprehensive review of the existing literature is a timely and valuable endeavor that promises to consolidate current understanding and potentially identify key trends or gaps. The methodology outlines a bibliometric study utilizing the Science Direct database to screen articles published between 2015 and 2025, using "work-life balance and health" as primary keywords. The analysis of 412 articles, executed with Vosviewer, promises insights into co-authorship, co-occurrence, and citation networks. However, the abstract raises some points for clarification. The inclusion of articles up to "2025" in the search timeframe is an anomaly, as it would imply reviewing future publications. Furthermore, the keywords listed ("work-life balance and health") appear to be slightly narrower than the "Employee Performance" indicated in the title, suggesting a potential scope discrepancy or an unarticulated linkage between health outcomes and performance. Additionally, the statement that "The results explain how to analyze Co-authorship, Co-occurrence, and Citation" reads more like a description of the methodology than a summary of the actual findings, which limits the reader's understanding of the study's substantive contributions. While the abstract concludes by hoping the research will be useful for further studies on work-life balance, it currently lacks concrete information regarding the specific insights gleaned from the bibliometric analysis. A robust abstract for such a study typically highlights key findings, such as dominant research themes, influential authors or institutions, emerging areas of study, or significant conceptual clusters identified within the literature. Without these specifics, it is challenging to gauge the actual contribution to knowledge beyond the execution of the bibliometric method itself. To enhance its impact, the abstract would benefit significantly from articulating the specific trends, patterns, or gaps discovered concerning work-life balance and its relationship with employee performance, thus moving beyond a procedural description to a summary of the valuable outcomes.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.