Jean-Pierre Olivier De Sardan

Anthropologie et science politique

Introduction

Anthropologie et science politique. Convergence anthropologie et science politique: méthodes qualitatives, politiques publiques et bureaucraties modernes en Afrique et Europe.

Abstract

Les clivages institutionnels académiques qui séparent anthropologie et science politique n’ont aucune valeur épistémologique ; par contre la science politique relève parfois de la raison exégétique (philosophie politique) et parfois de la raison empirique (enquêtes). Au sein de cette dernière, c’est avec le segment de la science politique qui recourt aux méthodes qualitatives que s’opère une convergence récente et significative avec l’anthropologie, en particulier le segment de celle-ci qui s’intéresse aux politiques publiques, aux services publics et aux bureaucraties modernes, en Afrique comme en Europe, loin des clichés culturalistes que l’on retrouve dans les deux disciplines.

Review

This article, "Anthropologie et science politique," immediately presents a compelling and timely argument regarding the relationship between two traditionally distinct academic disciplines. The abstract boldly asserts that the institutional divisions separating anthropology and political science lack true epistemological justification, thereby setting the stage for a much-needed critical examination of their boundaries and potential for synergy. This opening premise is both provocative and intellectually stimulating, promising a rigorous exploration of interdisciplinary collaboration rather than mere disciplinary demarcation. The abstract then meticulously clarifies the specific grounds for such convergence. It astutely differentiates between the exegetical (political philosophy) and empirical (surveys) dimensions within political science, identifying the latter, particularly its qualitative methodological approaches, as the crucial point of contact with anthropology. The article specifically targets the segment of anthropology concerned with public policies, public services, and modern bureaucracies, proposing a fertile ground for joint inquiry in both African and European contexts. Crucially, the abstract highlights an intention to move beyond "culturalist clichés," indicating a sophisticated and critical approach to cross-cultural analysis. Overall, this abstract suggests an article of significant academic value, offering a clear and well-articulated thesis that challenges conventional academic silos. By identifying precise areas of methodological and thematic overlap, particularly in the study of governance and public life, the work promises to contribute meaningfully to both fields. Its ambition to transcend culturalist stereotypes, while fostering a more nuanced interdisciplinary dialogue, positions it as an important intervention in the ongoing conversation about the evolving landscape of social science research.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.