I Wayan Pariarsana

ANALISIS PENERAPAN PASAL 70 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2012 SEBAGAI JUDICIAL PARDON TERHADAP ANAK YANG MELAKUKAN PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN

Introduction

Analisis penerapan pasal 70 undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2012 sebagai judicial pardon terhadap anak yang melakukan pencurian dengan pemberatan . Menganalisis konsep dan penerapan judicial pardon Pasal 70 UU SPPA terhadap anak pelaku pencurian dengan pemberatan, serta pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan pemaafan.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konsep judicial pardon dalam Pasal 70 UU SPPA dan pertimbangan hakim perkara nomor:2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN.Rgt yang menerapkan judicial pardon terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini, Pasal 70 UU SPPA perwujudan dari konsep judicial pardon, terbangun atas unsur-unsur Pasal 70 UU SPPA, sebagai klep/katup pengaman bagi hakim dalam penyelesaian perkara anak. Hakim menerapkan judicial pardon, karena kasus tersebut memenuhi syarat, yaitu ringannya perbuatan, keadaan pribadi anak, keadaan pada waktu dilakukan perbuatan, yang terjadi kemudian, dan mempertimbangkan keadilan dan kemanusiaan. Diperlukan harmonisasi antara hukum pidana materill dan formil mengenai putusan pemaafan.   Kata Kunci: pasal 70 UU SPPA, judicial pardon.

Review

This paper, "ANALISIS PENERAPAN PASAL 70 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2012 SEBAGAI JUDICIAL PARDON TERHADAP ANAK YANG MELAKUKAN PENCURIAN DENGAN PEMBERATAN," offers a pertinent examination of a crucial aspect of child justice in Indonesia. Focusing on Article 70 of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA), the research aims to analyze its concept as a judicial pardon and its practical application by judges in a specific case of child theft with aggravating circumstances. The use of normative legal research effectively elucidates the legal framework. A key strength lies in its clear articulation that Article 70 UU SPPA functions as a safety valve for judges, providing the discretion to grant a judicial pardon when specific criteria are met, such as the minor nature of the act, the child's personal circumstances, and considerations of justice and humanity. The identification of these elements is valuable for understanding judicial decision-making in this specialized area. While the paper effectively outlines the concept and application, there are areas where further depth would enhance its contribution. The abstract states that Article 70 is a "perwujudan dari konsep judicial pardon" (manifestation of the judicial pardon concept), but a more explicit theoretical discussion differentiating this judicial mechanism from traditional executive pardons or other forms of diversion in the context of child justice would be beneficial. Clarifying the precise legal nature and scope of this "pardon" would strengthen its analytical framework. Furthermore, the conclusion regarding the need for "harmonisasi antara hukum pidana materill dan formil mengenai putusan pemaafan" is significant, yet the abstract does not elaborate on the specific conflicts or disjunctions that necessitate such harmonization. Providing examples or a more detailed explanation of these areas would underscore the importance of this recommendation. Overall, this research makes a valuable contribution to the discourse on child justice and judicial discretion in Indonesia. By meticulously analyzing Article 70 UU SPPA and illustrating its application through a case study, the paper provides practical insights for judges, legal practitioners, and policymakers. It successfully highlights the importance of humane and justice-oriented approaches when dealing with children in conflict with the law, particularly in serious offenses like aggravated theft. The findings underscore the critical role of judicial discretion in ensuring that legal processes prioritize the welfare and rehabilitation of child offenders. This study is an important step towards a more nuanced understanding of the legal mechanisms available to protect children within the criminal justice system.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.