Yasmine Kusumawardhani, Edwin Rizal, Asep Saeful Rohman

The Relationship between Information Literacy and Playing Skills in Bridge Athletes at Padjadjaran University

Introduction

The relationship between information literacy and playing skills in bridge athletes at padjadjaran university. Discover the link between information literacy and bridge playing skills among Padjadjadan University athletes. Learn how applying information boosts strategy and decision-making for better game performance.

Abstract

This study analyzes the relationship between information literacy and playing skills in bridge athletes at Padjadjaran University. The formulation of the problem in this study is whether there is a relationship between the eight components of the empowering eight information literacy model, namely identification, exploration, selection, organization, creation, presentation, assessment, and application, with bridge playing skills in Padjadjaran University Bridge Athletes. This study uses a quantitative approach with a survey method, where questionnaires are distributed to a research sample of 45 bridge athletes. The study employs a saturated or census sampling technique, which involves including all population members as respondents. The data analysis technique used is the Spearman Rank correlation test to measure the relationship between information literacy and bridge playing skills. The results of the study showed that there was a significant relationship between information literacy and bridge playing skills. The information application subvariable has the strongest influence on bridge playing skills. This finding confirms that bridge athletes with better levels of information literacy have a higher ability to understand strategies and make more appropriate decisions during the match. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of developing information literacy skills in coaching bridge athletes, so that they can be more effective in processing and applying the information obtained. This study suggests the need to strengthen information literacy so that bridge athletes are accustomed to managing information effectively and making it part of the thinking process and decision-making while playing.

Review

This study presents an intriguing analysis of the relationship between information literacy and playing skills in bridge athletes at Padjadjaran University. By employing a quantitative survey methodology with a sample of 45 athletes, the research systematically examines the eight components of the 'Empowering Eight' information literacy model against bridge playing proficiency. The primary finding—a significant positive relationship, with the information application subvariable exerting the strongest influence—offers a compelling argument for the cognitive underpinnings of athletic performance in strategic games. The paper's premise is both novel and directly relevant to the development and coaching of athletes. A significant strength of this research lies in its clear problem formulation, which systematically unpacks the components of information literacy, providing a robust framework for analysis. The identification of 'information application' as the most impactful subvariable is particularly insightful, highlighting the critical role of translating knowledge into effective in-game decisions. This specific finding offers a concrete target for coaches and educators looking to enhance athlete performance. The use of a census sampling technique, encompassing all identified bridge athletes at the university, ensures a complete capture of the specified population, thus strengthening the internal validity for this particular context. While the study provides valuable insights, a few areas warrant further consideration. The abstract does not explicitly detail how "bridge playing skills" were operationalized or measured. Clarifying whether this involved objective performance metrics, coach evaluations, or self-assessments would significantly enhance the interpretability and robustness of the reported correlation. Furthermore, although the findings suggest an "influence," it is crucial to explicitly acknowledge the limitations of a correlational study in establishing direct causation. Future research could benefit from exploring these relationships through longitudinal designs, experimental interventions, or by expanding the sample size and scope beyond a single university to improve generalizability and provide a more comprehensive understanding of how information literacy truly impacts athletic success.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.