The Historical Development of Science
Home Research Details
Edgar H. Booth

The Historical Development of Science

0.0 (0 ratings)

Introduction

The historical development of science. Discover the fascinating historical development of science, charting the evolution of understanding from early beliefs to modern scientific knowledge.

0
14 views

Abstract

Provided that you have a good knowledge of our present beliefs with regard to the layer of gas surrounding our world, and which we call the atmosphere, it is very interesting to go away back into the past and read about the funny ideas held on the subject by our remote ancestors, and quite profitable to see how we have gradually arrived at the ideas which we have today.


Review

The submitted manuscript, titled "The Historical Development of Science," presents a significant mismatch between its broad and ambitious title and the highly specific focus indicated by its abstract. While the title suggests a comprehensive examination of the evolution of scientific thought across disciplines, the abstract explicitly confines its scope to the historical understanding of the Earth's atmosphere. This immediate discrepancy raises concerns regarding the paper's actual content and its adherence to the stated objective. Furthermore, the abstract's informal language, referring to past scientific ideas as "funny" and promising an "interesting" and "profitable" read, falls short of the objective and rigorous tone typically expected in academic publications. From the abstract alone, it is difficult to ascertain the academic merit or methodological approach of the paper. A historical review of scientific understanding, even on a specific topic like the atmosphere, can be a valuable contribution. However, the abstract fails to outline the paper's specific research questions, the periods covered, the sources consulted, or the analytical framework employed to trace the "gradual arrival" at current ideas. The lack of these crucial details makes it challenging to evaluate the depth and rigor of the historical analysis. If the paper indeed only addresses atmospheric science, the current title is fundamentally misleading; if it purports to cover the "historical development of science" more broadly, the abstract is woefully inadequate in representing that scope and content. Given these fundamental issues, I recommend significant revisions before further consideration. Firstly, the title *must* be revised to accurately reflect the paper's content, likely narrowing it substantially to focus on the historical development of atmospheric concepts. Secondly, the abstract needs a complete rewrite. It should adopt a formal, academic tone, clearly delineate the paper's precise scope, state its central argument or research questions, briefly describe the methodology or primary sources, and articulate its contribution to the existing literature. Without these substantial changes to both the title and the abstract, and an implicit need to review the entire manuscript for consistency in academic rigor and tone, the paper is not suitable for publication in its current form.


Full Text

You need to be logged in to view the full text and Download file of this article - The Historical Development of Science from Environment : a magazine of science .

Login to View Full Text And Download

Comments


You need to be logged in to post a comment.