Proceedings

Published IBIC'18 proceedings

Introduction

Published ibic'18 proceedings. Explore the published proceedings of IBIC'18, the International Beam Instrumentation Conference. Access key research and papers from the 2018 event.

Abstract

Review

The submission, titled 'Published IBIC'18 proceedings,' presents a significant challenge for review due to the complete absence of an accompanying abstract. Based solely on the title, it appears this submission is either an announcement or a compilation of the proceedings from the IBIC'18 conference. Proceedings typically represent a collection of peer-reviewed papers presented at a specific event, often covering a broad range of topics within a particular scientific or technical domain. However, without any descriptive text, the precise nature, scope, and intent of this submission remain entirely unclear, making it impossible to understand what is being presented for review. The complete lack of an abstract critically impedes any meaningful assessment of this work. An abstract is a foundational element of any scholarly publication, serving as a concise summary of its content, scope, methodology (if applicable), key findings, and overall contribution. For a proceedings volume, an abstract would typically outline the main themes addressed by the included papers, highlight the significance of the conference (IBIC'18) within its field, and indicate the types of contributions featured (e.g., invited talks, contributed papers, posters). Its absence prevents any evaluation of the volume's relevance, originality, or potential impact, and makes it impossible to gauge what value it would bring to readers or how it aligns with the journal's scope. To proceed with any form of review or consideration, it is absolutely imperative that a comprehensive and informative abstract be provided. This abstract should clearly articulate the purpose of the published proceedings, detail the thematic areas covered by the included papers, specify the target audience, and explain the significance of the IBIC'18 conference within its discipline. It should also clarify if this submission itself is meant to be an article *about* the proceedings, an *index* to the proceedings, or if the journal is being asked to *publish* the entire proceedings volume. Without this essential contextual information, the submission cannot be adequately evaluated, nor can its scholarly merit or contribution be determined. A revised submission with a detailed abstract is strongly recommended before any further steps can be taken.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.