Proceedings

Published HB'18 proceedings

Introduction

Published hb'18 proceedings. Access the published proceedings from HB'18. Explore a collection of research papers and presentations from the 2018 conference.

Abstract

Review

This submission, titled "Published HB'18 proceedings," immediately signals that it likely concerns the announcement or availability of a collection of papers from a specific conference, "HB'18," rather than presenting original research itself. As a standalone journal article, however, the most critical deficiency is the complete absence of an abstract. A well-crafted abstract is fundamental for any academic publication, serving to summarize the paper's purpose, methods, key findings, and conclusions, thereby allowing readers to quickly grasp its relevance and scope. Its omission renders this submission devoid of the most basic entry point for engagement and evaluation. Given the title's implication and the empty abstract, it is impossible to assess any intellectual content, methodological rigor, or contribution to the field. If the intent was simply to announce the publication of conference proceedings, such an item would typically be handled as an editorial, a news brief, or a special issue introduction rather than a research article requiring a full peer review process. Without a body of text and the essential abstract, this submission fails to provide any material for peer reviewers to evaluate against standard criteria for novelty, significance, or technical soundness. It appears to be an incomplete submission or one fundamentally misunderstood in its proposed journal format. Consequently, this submission, in its current form, is entirely unsuitable for publication as a journal article. For it to be considered, a comprehensive abstract detailing the scope and significance of the "HB'18 proceedings" would be an absolute minimum requirement, along with a full manuscript detailing the context, organization, and perhaps highlights of the included papers, if it were intended as an introductory piece. As it stands, it lacks the fundamental components of an academic paper and therefore cannot be recommended for acceptance.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.