Ronald Lukens-Bull

Pesantren, Madrasa, and the Future of Islamic Education in Indonesia

Introduction

Pesantren, madrasa, and the future of islamic education in indonesia. Explore the evolution of pesantren and madrasa in Indonesia, highlighting their ancient traditions, modernization efforts, and commitment to a plural, peaceful, and democratic society.

Abstract

This article delineates the development of pesantren and madrasa as avery significant part of Islamic education in Indonesia. In doing so, Iexplore three points related to the development. Firstly, there is an ancienttradition of accommodation in Indonesian Islamic education world. This isseen in the foundation myths that traditional pesantren use to understandtheir role in society. Secondly, there is a desire to modernize and to meetthe modern needs of both students and society while maintaining firmroots in traditional Islamic education. It must be an on-going ‘evolutionary’process. Thirdly, pesantren people have rejected the sharia state, the khilafa,the use of violence, and narrow understandings of what the nation shouldbe. They have worked hard to distance themselves from others that seek tocloak themselves in their legitimacy. Therefore, I would argue that thepesantren and other forms of Islamic education will contribute to the futureof Indonesia as a plural, peaceful and democratic society.

Review

This article proposes a timely and significant exploration of *pesantren* and *madrasa* as foundational institutions within Indonesian Islamic education. By delineating their historical development, the author aims to underscore their profound influence and argue for their crucial role in shaping Indonesia's future as a plural, peaceful, and democratic society. The scope outlined in the abstract is broad, encompassing historical traditions, ongoing modernization efforts, and a clear stance against extremist ideologies, which promises a comprehensive and relevant analysis. The abstract effectively outlines three core arguments that form the backbone of the article's thesis. Firstly, it highlights an ancient tradition of accommodation within Indonesian Islamic education, rooted in the foundational myths of traditional *pesantren*. Secondly, it identifies an "evolutionary" drive towards modernization that seeks to meet contemporary societal needs while firmly maintaining traditional Islamic roots. Most crucially, the third point emphasizes the *pesantren* community's principled rejection of concepts such as the sharia state, khilafa, violence, and narrow nationalism, actively distancing themselves from groups that seek to appropriate their legitimacy. These three points collectively build a compelling case for the positive contributions of *pesantren* and other forms of Islamic education to Indonesia's democratic and pluralistic fabric. While the article presents a clear and important thesis, the abstract could benefit from further detail regarding the methodological approach employed. It clearly states *what* will be explored and *what* the author will argue, but it does not specify *how* these claims will be substantiated (e.g., through historical analysis, textual interpretation, case studies, or ethnographic research). Clarifying the research design would strengthen the proposed analysis, allowing readers to better understand the evidence base for these significant claims, particularly concerning the projection into the "future" of Islamic education. Additionally, while the title includes *madrasa*, the abstract's arguments predominantly focus on *pesantren* people and their perspectives, and a more explicit integration of *madrasa* within the three points could enhance the overall coherence and scope as suggested by the title.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.