Josiane Pereira Torres , Jáima Pinheiro de Oliveira

PERSPECTIVAS DE DIÁLOGO ENTRE AS POLÍTICAS DO ATENDIMENTO EDUCACIONAL ESPECIALIZADO (AEE) E DA ESCOLA EM TEMPO INTEGRAL

Introduction

Perspectivas de diÁlogo entre as polÍticas do atendimento educacional especializado (aee) e da escola em tempo integral. Explore as perspectivas de diálogo e integração entre as políticas de Atendimento Educacional Especializado (AEE) e da Escola em Tempo Integral.

Abstract

não se aplica

Review

The submitted title, "PERSPECTIVAS DE DIÁLOGO ENTRE AS POLÍTICAS DO ATENDIMENTO EDUCACIONAL ESPECIALIZADO (AEE) E DA ESCOLA EM TEMPO INTEGRAL," translates to "Perspectives of Dialogue Between the Policies of Specialized Educational Service (AEE) and Full-Time School." This title suggests a highly relevant and timely topic within educational policy, particularly in contexts where inclusive education and extended school hours are critical areas of reform and implementation. However, the accompanying abstract is explicitly marked as "não se aplica" (not applicable/not provided). This fundamental omission immediately precludes any substantive preliminary evaluation of the work's scope, objectives, theoretical framework, methodology, or anticipated findings. An abstract is an indispensable component of any scholarly submission, serving as a concise summary that allows reviewers and potential readers to grasp the essence of the research without needing to access the full manuscript. Its absence renders it impossible to ascertain the novelty, rigor, or potential contribution of this paper to the existing literature. Without an abstract, I cannot assess whether the work presents a literature review, an empirical study, a theoretical exposition, or a policy analysis, nor can I identify its specific focus or the depth of its engagement with the proposed "dialogue" between AEE and full-time schooling policies. This significantly hampers the peer-review process and makes it impossible to provide an informed judgment on the paper's academic merit or suitability for publication. Given the complete absence of an abstract, it is impossible to proceed with a meaningful review of this submission. A well-crafted abstract is a minimum requirement for scholarly articles, enabling initial screening and guiding the assignment of appropriate reviewers. As presented, this submission does not meet the basic criteria for scholarly journal evaluation. Therefore, I recommend that the paper be returned to the authors with an explicit request to provide a comprehensive abstract detailing the research problem, methodology, key arguments, and main conclusions before any further consideration can be given. Without this crucial information, the paper cannot be assessed for its quality or contribution to the field.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.