Muhammad Usman, Theresia Widji Astuti, Fathushahib Fathushahib, Sanusi Sanusi, Fachruddin Fachruddin

Pengembangan Modul Penilaian Usulan Hibah Internal Pada Sistem Informasi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Politeknik Negeri Sambas

Introduction

Pengembangan modul penilaian usulan hibah internal pada sistem informasi penelitian dan pengabdian kepada masyarakat politeknik negeri sambas. Temukan pengembangan modul penilaian usulan hibah internal terintegrasi pada Sistem Informasi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Politeknik Negeri Sambas.

Abstract

Review

The provided title, "Pengembangan Modul Penilaian Usulan Hibah Internal Pada Sistem Informasi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Politeknik Negeri Sambas" (Development of an Internal Grant Proposal Assessment Module in the Research and Community Service Information System of Politeknik Negeri Sambas), suggests a practical, applied research project focused on institutional process improvement. The topic addresses a common need within academic institutions to streamline and enhance the management of internal research grants. Such a development could significantly improve efficiency, transparency, and accountability in the grant evaluation process. However, a comprehensive assessment of this work is severely hampered by the absence of the abstract. Without the abstract, it is impossible to evaluate several critical aspects that a journal reviewer would normally assess. A well-constructed abstract should articulate the specific problem addressed by the current system, the methodology employed in developing this assessment module (e.g., software engineering paradigm, technologies used), the key functionalities and features implemented, the results or outcomes of its deployment and testing, and the overall contribution or impact of this development to Politeknik Negeri Sambas. It would also clarify whether the paper focuses solely on the technical implementation or includes an evaluation of its effectiveness, user acceptance, or measured improvements in processing time or decision quality. Therefore, while the title points to a relevant and potentially impactful institutional project, a meaningful review cannot be conducted at this stage. The abstract is the gateway to understanding the scope, rigor, novelty, and implications of the research. To provide an expert evaluation, the complete abstract, outlining the problem, method, findings, and conclusion, is an indispensable requirement for proceeding with the review process. Without it, any commentary remains speculative regarding the paper's actual content and scientific merit.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.