Syahroni Syahroni, Yuli Haryanto, Thomas Afrizal

Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Sanksi Terhadap Perilaku Santri di Pondok Pesantren Asshaburratib Menggunakan Metode SAW

Introduction

Penerapan sistem pendukung keputusan dalam menentukan sanksi terhadap perilaku santri di pondok pesantren asshaburratib menggunakan metode saw. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) berbasis web dengan metode SAW untuk menentukan sanksi perilaku santri di Pondok Pesantren Asshaburratib secara adil dan tepat.

Abstract

Pondok Pesantren adalah institusi pendidikan berbasis keagamaan yang menanamkan nilai-nilai disiplin, akhlak, serta kedisiplinan kepada para santri melalui berbagai kegiatan keagamaan dan pembinaan karakter. Dalam praktiknya, terdapat santri yang melakukan pelanggaran dipondok, namun proses pemberian sanksi terhadap pelanggaran tersebut masih dilakukan secara manual tanpa pertimbangan dari pelanggaran yang ia lakukan sehingga sanksi yang diberikan tidak sesuai. Hal ini dapat menyebabkan ketidaktepatan dalam menentukan sanksi yang sesuai dengan perbuatannya. Maka dari itu, penilitan ini bermaksud untuk menyusun dan meningkatkan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) guna membantu pengurus pondok dalam menentukan sanksi terhadap perilaku santri dengan tepat dan adil. Metode yang diterapkan adalah Simple Weighting Additive (SAW), yang mampu memberikan hasil keputusan berdasarkan pembobotan terhadap beberapa kriteria. Hasil akhir dari penilitian ini yaitu sistem dibangun di atas web yang dapat diterapkan sebagai acuan untuk pemberian sanksi sesuai dengan pelanggaran yang dilakukan, sehingga pengurus pondok dapat memberikan sanksi yang tepat dan adil kepada para pelanggar.

Review

The study, "Penerapan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Menentukan Sanksi Terhadap Perilaku Santri di Pondok Pesantren Asshaburratib Menggunakan Metode SAW," tackles a highly relevant and practical issue within the context of religious educational institutions. The abstract clearly articulates a problem where the current manual process for issuing disciplinary sanctions for student misconduct at Pondok Pesantren Asshaburratib leads to inconsistent and potentially unfair outcomes due to a lack of structured consideration of the violations. To address this, the research proposes the development and enhancement of a Decision Support System (DSS) designed to aid administrators in determining appropriate and just sanctions. The methodology employed for this purpose is the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method, a well-established technique for multi-criteria decision-making. This research makes a valuable contribution by providing a systematic and objective approach to a critical administrative function. The objective of achieving fairness and precision in sanctioning is particularly commendable, as it directly supports the disciplinary and character-building goals of a *pondok pesantren*. The application of the SAW method ensures that decisions are based on predefined criteria and weighted considerations, moving away from subjective judgments. Furthermore, the outcome of a web-based system enhances the practicality and accessibility of the solution, offering a tangible tool that administrators can readily utilize. This has significant potential to standardize disciplinary processes, foster a greater sense of justice among students, and ultimately strengthen the institution's disciplinary framework. While the abstract provides a strong overview, a more comprehensive exploration in the full paper would further enhance its academic rigor. It would be beneficial to elaborate on the precise criteria utilized for sanctioning and the methodology employed to assign weights within the SAW method. Understanding how these criteria and weights were determined—for instance, through consultations with *pondok* leadership, educational experts, or a review of established disciplinary guidelines—would bolster the system's validity and perceived fairness. Additionally, while the development of the system is noted, the paper would gain from a discussion of its evaluation, including any user testing, feedback mechanisms, or a comparative analysis of sanctioning outcomes before and after the system's implementation. These insights would provide robust evidence of the system's effectiveness and its practical impact on achieving the stated goals of accuracy and justice.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.