Michael Carden

Of Fathers and Daughters - Biblical Studies as a Multi-Faith, Pluralist, and Multi-Cultural Project

Introduction

Of fathers and daughters - biblical studies as a multi-faith, pluralist, and multi-cultural project. Biblical studies: a multi-faith, pluralist project. Compares Jewish, Christian & Islamic Genesis 19 interpretations, revealing moral failings & promoting diversity & inclusivity.

Abstract

The essay argues that biblical studies is a unique area for inter-religious and inter-cultural dialogue and enrichment. The biblical narratives provide sacred stories for at least three of the world religions. The paper explores Jewish, Christian and Islamic interpretations of the incident in Genesis 19 where Lot offers his daughters to the Sodomite mob and by comparing these interpretations highlights moral failings in the dominant Christian interpretive tradition. The essay argues that by recognising the biblical narratives as a multi-faith shared scripture, biblical studies can become grounded in principles of appreciation and respect for pluralism and diversity. These principles can be applied not only across traditions but also within traditions to ensure all voices have a chance to speak, especially those that might be silenced for not conforming to rigid orthodoxies including those based on gender, class, ethnicity, or sexuality.

Review

The proposed essay, "Of Fathers and Daughters - Biblical Studies as a Multi-Faith, Pluralist, and Multi-Cultural Project," presents a highly compelling and timely argument for re-envisioning the discipline of biblical studies. The author's central premise, that biblical studies offers a unique and fertile ground for inter-religious and inter-cultural dialogue, is not only innovative but also crucial in our increasingly interconnected world. By framing the biblical narratives as shared sacred stories across at least three major world religions, the paper immediately positions itself at the forefront of contemporary discussions on religious pluralism and academic inclusivity. The choice of the Genesis 19 incident involving Lot and his daughters as a case study promises a rich and challenging exploration, providing a concrete example to ground the theoretical framework. A significant strength of this project lies in its methodological approach, which involves a comparative analysis of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic interpretations of the Lot narrative. This comparative lens is expertly utilized not merely to highlight differences but, more importantly, to critically expose "moral failings in the dominant Christian interpretive tradition." Such an audacious and self-reflexive critique within the field is vital for progress and for fostering a more ethical engagement with ancient texts. Furthermore, the essay articulates a powerful vision for biblical studies, advocating for principles of appreciation and respect for pluralism and diversity. Crucially, these principles are not limited to inter-religious engagement but are extended to foster inclusivity *within* traditions, giving voice to perspectives often silenced due to rigid orthodoxies concerning gender, class, ethnicity, and sexuality. The implications of this essay for the future of biblical studies are profound. By demonstrating how a multi-faith, pluralist, and multi-cultural framework can enrich interpretive practices and challenge entrenched biases, the paper offers a transformative model for the discipline. It moves beyond mere academic engagement to advocate for a more ethically grounded and socially responsible form of scholarship. This project promises to be an essential contribution, not only to biblical studies but also to broader conversations around interfaith relations, ethics, and the role of humanities in fostering a more inclusive society. It is a highly recommended read for anyone interested in the evolving landscape of religious studies and critical hermeneutics.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.