José Antônio Dabdab Trabulsi

O imperialismo ateniense, Tucídides e a historiografia conteporânea, ou Do uso de um historiador antigo pelos historiadores contemporâneos

Introduction

O imperialismo ateniense, tucídides e a historiografia conteporânea, ou do uso de um historiador antigo pelos historiadores contemporâneos. Explore como Tucídides, o imperialismo ateniense e sua historiografia são reinterpretados por historiadores contemporâneos, desde a visão científica do séc. XIX até críticas atuais.

Abstract

Tucidides está fora de moda. Depois de ter sido entronizado pela nascente historiografia científica do século XIX como o "verdadeiro pai da história", aquele que tornou o conhecimento do passado uma ciência, com o mesmo rigor das ciências naturais, e de ter assim atravessado triunfantemente a primeira metade deste século, Tucidides foi em seguida impiedosamente acusado de ter uma visão que não ia mais longe que um campo de batalha, sendo assim combatido como o inspirador da "histoire événementíelle".

Review

The article "O imperialismo ateniense, Tucídides e a historiografia conteporânea, ou Do uso de um historiador antigo pelos historiadores contemporâneos" proposes a vital and thought-provoking examination of Thucydides' shifting status within the landscape of modern historical scholarship. The abstract clearly outlines the central historiographical tension: Thucydides' initial veneration in the 19th century as the "true father of history," praised for his scientific rigor, contrasted with his later fall from grace, when he was critically dismissed for a seemingly narrow, battlefield-centric perspective and as an inspirer of "histoire événementíelle." This dynamic provides a compelling framework for investigating how historical figures and their works are reinterpreted through successive academic paradigms. The core strength of this paper lies in its explicit commitment to dissecting the methodological and philosophical shifts that have dictated Thucydides' reception. By tracing his journey from triumphant acceptance to being "out of fashion," the article promises to offer a nuanced critique of how historical knowledge is constructed and how ancient sources are engaged with. This approach is invaluable for understanding not only Thucydides' specific legacy but also for a broader meta-historical reflection on the evolving standards, inherent biases, and interpretive frameworks that shape historical inquiry across different eras. The investigation into "the use of an ancient historian by contemporary historians" suggests a critical self-reflection on current scholarly practices. Ultimately, this work is poised to make a significant contribution to both ancient history and the broader field of historiography. By connecting the specific topic of Athenian imperialism with the fluctuating interpretations of Thucydides, it addresses fundamental questions about the nature of historical evidence, narrative construction, and the application of modern methodologies to ancient texts. The article's focus on the reception and utility of foundational historical figures ensures that it will stimulate valuable discussion and encourage a more critical engagement with both the sources we consult and the lenses through which we view the past.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.