Luthfia, Wian Ayu Wardha’adlina, Rida Ayu Surya Putri, Mario Pintor David Simanjutak, Siti Rachmawati

Indonesian Indonesia

Introduction

Indonesian indonesia. This study measures noise levels at Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia. Discover how noise, often exceeding 55 dB(A), impacts the campus learning environment, peaking with highway activity.

Abstract

The university, one of the primary channels for the transfer of information, is heavily influenced by several outside forces. It is well-recognized that noise can interfere with learning and teaching, upsetting and distracting pupils in the process. This investigation aimed to gauge the noise intensity and plot its dispersion across Sebelas Maret University's Mesen Campus. This study was carried out at the Mesen Campus of Sebelas Maret University. Using a sound level meter and the GPS Essentials application to create waypoints for the research locations, the data collection and measurement method is carried out directly in the field with a quantitative approach for 10 minutes at each place. The measurement time is conducted during the course of the 9-hour activity at regular intervals between 08.30 and 17.30, with a measuring distance every three hours in the morning, afternoon, and evening. Descriptive data analysis was done on the collected information by comparing the value Leq, and the noise quality criterion. Noise mapping using the Surfer software. The findings revealed that the noise level at the FSRD's entrance was 90.37 dB(A), that it was 81.45 dB(A) in front of the FSRD class, 78.35 dB(A) in the middle of the field, and that it was 55.57 dB(A) in front of the vocational school. The noise level surpasses the quality standard established by the government in KEP-48/MENLH/11/1996 regarding the Noise Level Standard for School Activities or the Like, which is 55 dB(A), according to all of the data. Due to the increased amount of highway activity, the four points' noise levels are at their maximum between 16:30–17:30 in the afternoon.

Review

This study addresses a pertinent issue concerning environmental noise within a university campus, an area critical for effective learning and information transfer. The authors set out to quantify noise intensity and map its dispersion across Sebelas Maret University's Mesen Campus, employing a direct, quantitative approach using sound level meters and GPS technology. The key finding, that noise levels at several measured points significantly exceed the Indonesian government's quality standard for school activities (55 dB(A)), particularly peaking in the late afternoon, highlights a potential environmental hazard to the academic environment. The use of standard measurement tools and comparison against a regulatory benchmark are commendable aspects of the methodology. However, several significant concerns need to be addressed. Firstly, the title "Indonesian Indonesia" bears no discernible connection to the abstract's content and requires immediate and complete revision to accurately reflect the study's focus. Methodologically, while the approach is quantitative, further detail is needed regarding the selection criteria for the four specific measurement points and whether these are representative of the entire campus. The phrase "measuring distance every three hours" is ambiguous; it likely refers to measurement intervals but should be clarified. Furthermore, while the abstract presents clear findings, it lacks a substantial discussion of the implications of these high noise levels beyond merely stating their exceedance of standards. Exploring the potential impact on student health, concentration, and teaching effectiveness, or offering preliminary mitigation strategies, would significantly strengthen the paper's contribution. In conclusion, this paper tackles an important topic with a solid quantitative foundation, yielding findings that warrant attention from university administrators. Nevertheless, it requires substantial revisions before it can be considered for publication. The most critical changes include a relevant and informative title, a more detailed and clearer exposition of the methodology (especially regarding point selection and measurement intervals), and an expanded discussion section that delves into the implications of the findings and potential avenues for addressing the identified noise pollution. With these revisions, the paper has the potential to make a valuable contribution to the field of environmental acoustics in educational settings.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.