Ezra Septiano Priwahyudi

FOTOGRAFI JURNALISTIK DI DINAS PARIWISATA, PEMUDA DAN OLAHRAGA KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR SEBAGAI MEDIA PENYAMPAIAN KEGIATAN PEMERINTAH

Introduction

Fotografi jurnalistik di dinas pariwisata, pemuda dan olahraga kabupaten karanganyar sebagai media penyampaian kegiatan pemerintah. Pelajari peran fotografi jurnalistik di Dinas Pariwisata, Pemuda dan Olahraga Karanganyar sebagai media efektif penyampaian kegiatan pemerintah daerah.

Abstract

Dunia seni visual pada saat ini telah mengalami banyak perubahan besar salah satu perubahan itu adalah perkembangan dalam media. Dalam perkembangannya seni dan teknologi adalah dua sisi yang saling melengkapi dalam perjalanan peradaban manusia. Salah satu media yang merupakan gabungan dari kedua elemen itu adalah fotografi. Fotografi Jurnalistik adalah salah satu genre dalam dunia fotografi. Foto jurnalistik pun juga memiliki berbagai macam jenisnya dan setiap foto harus memenuhi syarat-syarat di dalamnya karena tidak semua foto dapat dikatakan sebagai foto jurnalistik.

Review

The article's title, "FOTOGRAFI JURNALISTIK DI DINAS PARIWISATA, PEMUDA DAN OLAHRAGA KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR SEBAGAI MEDIA PENYAMPAIAN KEGIATAN PEMERINTAH," suggests a focused, applied study examining the role of journalistic photography within a specific government institution to communicate its activities. This specificity in context and purpose is a potential strength, indicating a practical investigation into a relevant local issue. However, the accompanying abstract presents a significant disconnect. It begins with broad, almost philosophical statements about visual arts, media evolution, and the art-technology nexus, before briefly defining journalistic photography. These introductory remarks, while not inherently incorrect, are far too general for a concise research abstract and fail to immediately establish the core subject matter of the study itself. A critical flaw of this abstract is its complete omission of key components essential for any research summary. There is no clear articulation of the study's research objectives, questions, or the specific problem it aims to address. Readers are left unaware of *what* the authors set out to investigate regarding journalistic photography at the Karanganyar Regency office. Furthermore, the abstract provides absolutely no information about the methodology employed—how the data was collected, analyzed, or what theoretical framework, if any, guided the research. Crucially, it also lacks any mention of findings, results, conclusions, or the practical/theoretical implications of the study. Instead, it reads more like a preliminary introduction to the concept of journalistic photography rather than a summary of an actual research project. For this submission to be considered further, a complete overhaul of the abstract is imperative. The authors must rewrite it to precisely reflect the study's purpose, methodology, key findings, and main conclusions, ensuring it accurately summarizes the full scope of the research as suggested by the title. It needs to clearly state what was done, how it was done, and what was discovered, connecting these elements directly to the specific context of the Karanganyar Regency's government activities. Without these fundamental elements, the abstract fails its primary function of informing potential readers about the content and contribution of the article, making it difficult to assess the paper's value or suitability for publication in its current form.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.