Ajeng Fitria, Alfi Khoirunnisa

Dominasi dan Hegemoni dalam Cerkak Nglari Nakagawa Karya Suparto Brata

Introduction

Dominasi dan hegemoni dalam cerkak nglari nakagawa karya suparto brata. Telusuri dominasi & hegemoni Jepang dalam cerkak Nglari Nakagawa karya Suparto Brata. Analisis postkolonial ini mengungkap efek mimikri & subaltern menggunakan teori Gramsci.

Abstract

Colonization in Indonesia has been going on for centuries. One of the cruelest forms of domination was that of the Japanese in the Dutch East Indies (Indonesia's name at the time). Over time, Japan became a nightmare that haunted society. This domination goes hand in hand with hegemony as a strengthening of power. This is reflected in a literary work, namely the cerkak entitled Nglari Nakagawa by Suparto Brata. From this discussion, it is hoped that Japanese domination and hegemony can be known and that Nglari Nakagawa can be proven as postcolonial literature. To dissect the story, Gramsci's theory of hegemony is used, supported by other theories, such as orientalism, mimicry, subaltern, and others. The analysis results show that the domination and hegemony carried out by the Japanese caused side effects in the form of mimicry, othering, and subaltern performed by the natives by taking the example of the colonizers. Related to the Japanese rule, the hegemony that prevails in society cannot be concluded equally, but it varies among individuals due to differences in colonization experiences. Looking at the content of Nglari Nakagawa's cerkak, it can be classified as a postcolonial work, one of which is shown by Nakagawa's anomalous existence trying to defy the dominant stereotypes in society.

Review

This paper presents a timely and relevant analysis of Japanese domination and hegemony during the occupation of the Dutch East Indies, as depicted in Suparto Brata's cerkak, *Nglari Nakagawa*. The abstract effectively introduces the historical context of centuries-long colonization in Indonesia, pinpointing the Japanese period as particularly brutal and a source of societal trauma. By employing a robust theoretical framework, primarily Gramsci's theory of hegemony, and supported by complementary concepts such as orientalism, mimicry, and subaltern studies, the research aims to dissect how power dynamics operate within this specific literary work. The explicit goal to prove *Nglari Nakagawa* as a piece of postcolonial literature using these established theories is clearly articulated, promising a significant contribution to the field. The analysis appears to yield insightful findings regarding the multifaceted impacts of Japanese domination and hegemony. The abstract highlights the "side effects" experienced by the colonized, manifesting as mimicry, othering, and subaltern practices, wherein natives emulate their colonizers. A particularly nuanced finding is the conclusion that hegemony does not uniformly prevail across society but varies among individuals, directly correlated with diverse colonization experiences. This point offers a valuable refinement to general understandings of hegemonic influence and hints at a sophisticated discussion within the full paper. Furthermore, the abstract asserts *Nglari Nakagawa*'s classification as a postcolonial work, specifically citing Nakagawa's "anomalous existence" and defiance of dominant stereotypes as key evidence, suggesting a compelling character study that challenges conventional portrayals. Overall, this paper promises to be a valuable addition to postcolonial literary criticism and Indonesian studies. Its focused examination of a specific Indonesian literary work through a sophisticated theoretical lens contributes to a deeper understanding of historical trauma, power dynamics, and the complexities of identity formation under colonial rule. The exploration of individual variations in experiencing hegemony is particularly commendable for its analytical depth and potential to enrich existing scholarship. Provided the full paper rigorously substantiates these claims with detailed textual analysis and comprehensive theoretical application, it will undoubtedly offer significant insights into the enduring legacies of colonialism. This work holds strong potential for publication and will be of great interest to scholars of postcolonial literature, cultural studies, and Indonesian history.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.