Lainuvar

Deconstructing The Meaning Of Pluralism: The Relevance Of Gus Dur's Fikrah Pluralism And Its Implications For Religious Life In Indonesia

Introduction

Deconstructing the meaning of pluralism: the relevance of gus dur's fikrah pluralism and its implications for religious life in indonesia. Explore Gus Dur's unique pluralism, its development, and profound implications for religious life in Indonesia. Understand his approach to inter-religious conflict resolution.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe Gus Dur's pluralism thinking and the resolution of conflicts between religions by Gus Dur. Therefore, it is essential to know how Gus Dur's pluralism thinking developed in Indonesia and its implications for the lives of religious people. The approach taken in this research is a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis, which is used because this research provides a clear and detailed explanation. The type of research is library research. Data collection comes from books and journal articles relevant to the theme. Data processing is done by analyzing the sources and sorting them, then choosing the source that is closest to the discussion in this study. The results of this study indicate that Gus Dur's pluralistic thought is slightly different. Gus Dur does not generalize all religions but recognizes that each religious adherent has its aspects of true belief. Gus Dur's thought of pluralism was realized with the revocation of the Presidential Instruction, the defense of the Ahmadiyah, and the rejection of establishing an Islamic state.

Review

This study embarks on a highly relevant and timely exploration of Gus Dur's contributions to pluralism, particularly within the complex religious landscape of Indonesia. The stated purpose, to describe his pluralistic thought and its implications for inter-religious conflict resolution, promises valuable insights into a figure whose legacy remains profoundly influential. The title's ambition to "deconstruct" the meaning of pluralism through Gus Dur's *fikrah* is commendable, suggesting a deeper analytical engagement with his unique philosophical and practical approach to religious diversity. This research has the potential to offer significant contributions to discussions on religious harmony, both regionally and globally, by elucidating a nuanced model of pluralism. However, the methodological outline provided in the abstract could benefit from greater specificity and rigor. While a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis and library research is appropriate for this subject, the brief description lacks the detail expected for a thorough academic inquiry. The abstract mentions data collection from "books and journal articles relevant to the theme" and data processing involving "analyzing the sources and sorting them, then choosing the source that is closest to the discussion." This general phrasing raises questions about the specific criteria for source selection, the balance between primary and secondary sources, and the analytical framework employed to "deconstruct" rather than merely describe. A more explicit articulation of the analytical method and the specific types of sources (e.g., Gus Dur's original writings, speeches, interviews, biographies, academic analyses of his thought) would enhance the study's transparency and perceived methodological strength. The preliminary findings indicate a thoughtful analysis of Gus Dur's pluralism, highlighting its distinctiveness in recognizing "aspects of true belief" within each religion rather than generalizing. The concrete examples cited – the revocation of a Presidential Instruction, defense of the Ahmadiyah, and rejection of an Islamic state – effectively illustrate the practical implications of his *fikrah* pluralism. To fully realize the promise of "deconstructing" this thought, the study should ensure a robust discussion elaborating *how* Gus Dur's approach differs and the underlying philosophical or theological reasoning. Further exploration into the long-term impact and contemporary relevance of these actions beyond the historical context would also strengthen the study's contribution, offering guidance for current challenges in religious life in Indonesia.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.