Dasapta Erwin Irawan

Anatomi makalah Jurnal Geoaplika dan hal unik lainnya

Introduction

Anatomi makalah jurnal geoaplika dan hal unik lainnya. Pelajari anatomi makalah Jurnal Geoaplika dan prinsip sains terbuka yang dianutnya: open access, open review, dan open data, seperti dijelaskan dalam undangan pengiriman makalah.

Abstract

Makalah ini menjelaskan anatomi makalah dan beberapa hal baru terkait prinsip sains terbuka yang dianut oleh Jurnal Geoaplika, yaitu: open access, open review, dan open data. Ini tercermin dari anatomi makalah yang kami sampaikan dalam Undangan Pengiriman Makalah.

Review

This paper, "Anatomi makalah Jurnal Geoaplika dan hal unik lainnya," aims to detail the structural anatomy of articles published in Jurnal Geoaplika, while also elucidating the journal's adoption of key open science principles: open access, open review, and open data. As stated in the abstract, these foundational policies are woven into the very fabric of the submission guidelines, as communicated in their Call for Papers. The initiative to clearly articulate both submission requirements and the journal's commitment to modern publishing ethics is a positive step, promoting transparency and offering crucial guidance for prospective authors. The dedication to open access, open review, and open data is highly commendable, positioning Jurnal Geoaplika at the forefront of contemporary scholarly publishing practices. These principles are vital for enhancing the accessibility, transparency, and reproducibility of research, which are undoubtedly beneficial for the global academic community. However, a significant concern arises regarding the format of this contribution. Presenting what essentially functions as author guidelines and a declaration of editorial policy as a peer-reviewed "makalah" (paper) is unconventional. Such content is typically reserved for a journal's official "About Us" section, detailed author instructions on its website, or perhaps an editorial from the journal's leadership, rather than an article submitted for standard academic review. While the information conveyed in this piece is undoubtedly valuable for Jurnal Geoaplika's operational clarity and for fostering an informed author community, its presentation as a scholarly article warrants careful consideration. To elevate this beyond a mere procedural document and establish its academic merit, it would ideally need to delve into a more analytical or comparative discussion. For instance, it could explore the challenges and successes of implementing these open science principles within the specific context of Geoaplika, compare its approach with other journals, or present empirical data on the impact of its policies. As it stands, the abstract suggests a primarily descriptive piece, which, though essential for the journal's internal ecosystem, may struggle to contribute substantively to the broader scholarly discourse without further critical analysis or empirical support.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.