Elda Dwi Pratiwi, Khofifah Ajeng Triani, Fahmi Alizar Nur Fachrudi, Dadang Sundawa, Dwi Iman Mutaqqin

Tinjauan Filsafat Hukum Terhadap Aturan Pemberian Alat Kontrasepsi Bagi Siswa Usia Sekolah dan Remaja

Introduction

Tinjauan filsafat hukum terhadap aturan pemberian alat kontrasepsi bagi siswa usia sekolah dan remaja. Tinjauan filsafat hukum Pancasila terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah No. 28/2024 tentang penyediaan alat kontrasepsi bagi siswa dan remaja. Mengkaji ketidakselarasan dan inefektivitasnya.

Abstract

Pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji substansi Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 28 Tahun 2024 tentang Kesehatan, khususnya ketentuan penyediaan alat kontrasepsi bagi remaja dan pelajar, ditinjau dari perspektif filsafat hukum Pancasila. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan hukum normatif-empiris, dengan tahapan kajian terhadap norma hukum yang berlaku serta analisis implementasinya di masyarakat. Data diperoleh melalui informan sebanyak 278 responden dari SMAN 1 Bantarujeg, serta literatur hukum dan dokumen resmi sebagai data sekunder. Hasil pengabdian menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan dalam PP tersebut tidak selaras dengan nilai-nilai filsafat hukum Pancasila dan tidak efektif sebagai solusi peningkatan kesehatan reproduksi remaja. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan langkah edukasi yang terintegrasi dengan nilai agama dan norma kesusilaan yang memiliki payung hukum yang jelas.

Review

The article, "Tinjauan Filsafat Hukum Terhadap Aturan Pemberian Alat Kontrasepsi Bagi Siswa Usia Sekolah dan Remaja," addresses a highly pertinent and sensitive issue concerning public health policy and adolescent well-being in Indonesia. The study's stated objective is to critically examine the substance of Government Regulation No. 28 of 2024, specifically its provisions for providing contraceptives to adolescents and school-aged students. By grounding its analysis within the framework of Pancasila legal philosophy, the paper positions itself to offer a robust and culturally relevant critique of a policy with profound societal implications, operating at the intersection of law, ethics, and public health. Methodologically, the paper employs a normative-empirical legal approach, combining an examination of existing legal norms with an analysis of their practical implementation. The collection of empirical data from 278 respondents at SMAN 1 Bantarujeg, complemented by legal literature and official documents, suggests a comprehensive investigative design. The core finding indicates that the contested provisions within PP No. 28 of 2024 are deemed inconsistent with the fundamental values of Pancasila legal philosophy and are, furthermore, ineffective in achieving their stated goal of improving adolescent reproductive health. This critical assessment of both normative alignment and practical efficacy forms the crux of the study's contribution. This review finds the paper's strength in undertaking a timely and necessary philosophical-legal critique of a significant public policy. The integration of empirical insights with a philosophical legal analysis is particularly commendable, offering a multi-dimensional perspective on a complex issue. While the abstract strongly concludes that the regulation is misaligned and ineffective, it also proposes a constructive alternative: advocating for education integrated with religious and moral values, backed by a clear legal umbrella. To enhance its impact, the full paper might benefit from further elaboration on precisely *how* the empirical findings concretely inform the philosophical conclusions regarding Pancasila values, and a more detailed outlining of the precise mechanisms through which the proposed educational framework would overcome the identified shortcomings. Nevertheless, this paper offers valuable insights and a strong call for policy re-evaluation, making a significant contribution to discussions on adolescent reproductive health policy in Indonesia.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.