The science of running. Delve into the science of running, exploring its physiological benefits, ancestral roots, and historical impact. Safely strengthen your heart, lungs, and vascular system.
Running is the most primitive of all types of muscular activity. It is man's oldest racial movement. The effects of running are physiologically more far-reaching than any other form of physical activity. Running does not overdevelop or hyper-trophy any muscular groups. It normally develops in the safest way the very dynamos of life, the heart, lungs and vascular system. Running awakens the most primitive urges and joys of life, because there still exist in the neurones of man the remnants of his ancestral flights in chasing, hunting and catching. When youth and man run they wildly and joyously recapitulate the story of their long distant past. The recorded history of the art shows Pheidippides, the greatest runner of all time, performing a deed unbeatable up to modern times. Two great athletic deeds he is honoured with. Not only did he run from Athens to Sparta in two days, a distance of 152 miles, but he bore the message of the Greeks' victory over the Persians from the battlefield of Marathon to the City of Athens. It is not recorded in what time he did this 26 miles, but the distance was run so swiftly that it was the cause of his death, for he only had time to utter the words " Rejoice, we conquer " and he collapsed.
This abstract, titled "The Science of Running," offers a profoundly evocative and philosophical reflection on running, portraying it as a primal human activity with extensive physiological and psychological benefits. It highlights running's role in developing the cardiovascular system and stimulating primitive urges, even drawing a historical parallel to Pheidippides. The language is rich and passionate, effectively communicating the author's deep appreciation for the act of running and its significance to human history and well-being. However, as a submission purporting to discuss "the science" of running, the abstract is critically deficient. It presents numerous strong assertions regarding physiological effects, such as running developing the heart and lungs in "the safest way" and not over-developing muscle groups, without providing any scientific evidence, methodology, or empirical data to substantiate these claims. The historical anecdotes, while engaging, do not contribute to a scientific understanding or analysis. There is a complete absence of typical scientific abstract components, such as a research question, methods, results, or conclusions derived from systematic investigation. In its current form, the abstract functions more as an essay or a lyrical tribute to running rather than a summary of a scientific paper. For this work to be considered suitable for a scientific journal, the abstract would require a complete overhaul. It must clearly articulate a scientific objective, describe the specific research methods employed (e.g., physiological studies, biomechanical analysis, clinical trials), present key findings, and offer a conclusion that is grounded in empirical data and scientific rigor, aligning with the "science" promised in the title. Without these fundamental elements, the submission lacks the necessary scientific merit for publication in a scholarly journal.
You need to be logged in to view the full text and Download file of this article - The Science of Running from Environment : a magazine of science .
Login to View Full Text And DownloadYou need to be logged in to post a comment.
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria
By Sciaria