Iacopo Benincampi

Recensione a: M.B. Guerrieri Borsoi (a cura di), Le arti a Frascati dall’Antichità al Settecento, Roma, Edizioni Tored 2021, pp. 224

Introduction

Recensione a: m.b. Guerrieri borsoi (a cura di), le arti a frascati dall’antichità al settecento, roma, edizioni tored 2021, pp. 224. Recensione critica del volume 'Le arti a Frascati dall’Antichità al Settecento'. Un'analisi della produzione artistica e culturale di Frascati attraverso i secoli.

Abstract

Review

This submission presents a clear bibliographic entry for a book review, "Recensione a: M.B. Guerrieri Borsoi (a cura di), Le arti a Frascati dall’Antichità al Settecento." The title effectively identifies the reviewed volume, outlining its editor, full title, publisher, year of publication, and page count. From this information, it is evident that the original work is an art-historical study focused on the region of Frascati, spanning a significant period from Antiquity through the Eighteenth Century. This suggests a comprehensive cultural and artistic exploration of a specific geographical area, making it a potentially valuable contribution to regional art history. However, a fundamental and critical element is entirely absent from this submission: the abstract. As an expert in reviewing journals, the lack of an abstract for the *review itself* is a significant impediment to any meaningful assessment. An abstract serves as a concise summary of the review's content, outlining its critical stance, the key arguments it makes about the book, the aspects it highlights (e.g., strengths, weaknesses, methodological approaches, new contributions), and its overall significance to the scholarly discourse. Without this essential component, it is impossible to gauge the quality, depth, or specific focus of the critical engagement with Guerrieri Borsoi's edited volume. Consequently, without an abstract, this submission is incomplete and cannot be properly evaluated for publication in any academic journal. The abstract is not merely a formality but a crucial navigational tool for editors and readers, informing them about the review's specific contribution and perspective on the original work. To be considered for peer review, a comprehensive abstract must be provided, detailing the reviewer's critical insights, the key takeaways regarding *Le arti a Frascati dall’Antichità al Settecento*, and how this review contributes to the broader academic conversation on art history or regional studies.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.