Reza Idria

Provisional Notes on How “Hilarious” Living Under ShariaLaw (The Case of Aceh)

Introduction

Provisional notes on how “hilarious” living under sharialaw (the case of aceh). Explore "hilarious" aspects of living under Sharia Law in Aceh, drawing on anthropological theory of resistance and ethnographic stories of humor and dissent.

Abstract

Drawing upon anthropological theory of resistance and testing its limits, I will present a closer observation on how dissenting voices to thestate project of Sharia in contemporary Aceh look on the ground.Without thereby renouncing its violent effects, some ethnographicstories I recount in this writing will reveal how the implementation ofSharia in contemporary Aceh has created inherently amusing situationsand how it has occasionally become a humor producing machine.

Review

This paper, provocatively titled "Provisional Notes on How 'Hilarious' Living Under Sharia Law (The Case of Aceh)," presents a highly original and theoretically ambitious exploration of resistance to state-imposed Sharia in contemporary Aceh. The abstract immediately signals a nuanced approach, situating the inquiry within anthropological theories of resistance while explicitly acknowledging and not renouncing the violent effects of Sharia implementation. By focusing on how "dissenting voices" perceive and react to their circumstances, the author intends to demonstrate how seemingly oppressive systems can inadvertently generate "inherently amusing situations" and become a "humor producing machine." This reframing of lived experience, particularly the use of "hilarious" in scare quotes, promises a fresh perspective on human agency and adaptation in challenging environments. A significant strength of this proposed work lies in its innovative conceptualization of resistance. Moving beyond overt forms of opposition, the paper seeks to test the limits of existing theory by exploring humor, irony, and absurdity as subtle yet potent expressions of dissent and coping mechanisms. The promise of rich "ethnographic stories" suggests a grounded and empathetic investigation into the everyday lives of individuals in Aceh, offering a granular understanding of how they navigate and comment on the Sharia project. This approach has the potential to significantly enrich our understanding of resistance, highlighting its less visible manifestations and the psychological dimensions of living under authoritarian religious law. The careful contextualization within Aceh, a unique case study, further enhances its scholarly relevance. While the abstract provides a compelling premise, the final paper would benefit from a rigorous analytical framework for categorizing and interpreting the various forms of humor and amusement observed. Differentiating between dark humor, satire, ironic detachment, or gallows humor, and exploring their specific functions—whether as a cathartic release, a subversive critique, or a mechanism for community building—would add depth to the theoretical contribution. Given the sensitivity of the topic and the focus on "dissenting voices," robust ethical considerations in data presentation, ensuring the safety and anonymity of informants, will be paramount. Ultimately, these "provisional notes" offer a highly promising intervention into anthropological studies of resistance and power, providing valuable insights into the complex and often counter-intuitive ways individuals negotiate and challenge oppressive regimes through the lens of lived absurdity.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.