Kanya Eka Santi

Preferensi Kajian Pekerjaan Sosial pada Skripsi Mahasiswa : Analisis Pola Minat dan Isu Pekerjaan Sosial Kontemporer

Introduction

Preferensi kajian pekerjaan sosial pada skripsi mahasiswa : analisis pola minat dan isu pekerjaan sosial kontemporer . Analisis preferensi topik skripsi mahasiswa Pekerjaan Sosial di Indonesia. Ungkap pola minat, isu kontemporer, dan faktor pilihan untuk pengembangan kurikulum.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the patterns of topic and field selection in undergraduate social work students’ theses in Indonesia. Using descriptive method, a total of 262 thesis titles from the 2024/2025 academic year were categorized into 14 specialized study fields. Additionally, qualitative data were gathered from 61 students via questionnaires to explore their reasons for topic selection, suggestions on subject-specific courses, and experiences in thesis supervision. The findings reveal that child-related social work is the most preferred field (41.4%), followed by poverty, aging, disability, and education. Key factors influencing topic choice include personal interest, practical experience, ease of data access, and social relevance. However, topic repetition and limited exploration of novel research ideas are still common. These findings highlight the need for curriculum review, improved field placement systems, and more contextual supervision strategies to support the diversification and originality of student research. This study offers practical input for curriculum development, thesis supervision planning, and the formulation of a research roadmap aligned with contemporary social issues.

Review

This study, "Preferensi Kajian Pekerjaan Sosial pada Skripsi Mahasiswa: Analisis Pola Minat dan Isu Pekerjaan Sosial Kontemporer," presents a highly relevant and insightful analysis into the research preferences of undergraduate social work students in Indonesia. Its primary objective, to systematically map the patterns of topic and field selection in student theses, is crucial for understanding the prevailing interests and potential gaps in current social work education. The methodology is robust, employing a descriptive approach that thoughtfully combines a quantitative analysis of 262 thesis titles with qualitative data from 61 student questionnaires, providing a comprehensive view of both the 'what' and 'why' behind topic choices. The findings offer significant insights, revealing a strong preference for child-related social work, followed by areas such as poverty, aging, disability, and education. Factors influencing these choices, including personal interest, practical experience, data accessibility, and social relevance, are clearly articulated. However, a critical observation from the study is the prevalence of topic repetition and a limited exploration of novel research ideas. This finding is particularly important, as it points to a potential challenge within the curriculum and supervision structures that may hinder students from engaging with a broader spectrum of contemporary social work issues and developing original contributions to the field. Ultimately, this research serves as a valuable diagnostic tool for social work education in Indonesia. The authors' recommendations for curriculum review, improved field placement systems, and more contextual supervision strategies directly address the identified issues and offer a clear pathway for fostering greater diversification and originality in student research. The study's practical input for curriculum development, thesis supervision planning, and the formulation of a research roadmap aligned with contemporary social issues makes it a highly commendable contribution, poised to significantly enhance the relevance and impact of future social work scholarship.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.