Carolyn Korsmeyer

Prazeres estéticos

Introduction

Prazeres estéticos. Explore a profundidade dos prazeres estéticos e sua influência na experiência humana. Uma tradução de Osvaldo Carvalho com revisão de Inês Lacerda Araújo.

Abstract

Tradução Osvaldo Carvalho. Revisão Inês Lacerda Araújo.

Review

The submission, titled "Prazeres estéticos," presents a significant challenge for review due to the extreme brevity and complete lack of substantive information in its abstract. Comprising only "Tradução Osvaldo Carvalho. Revisão Inês Lacerda Araújo," the abstract solely identifies the translator and reviser, offering absolutely no insight into the article's content, scope, methodology, or argument. This deficiency makes it impossible to assess the paper's relevance, originality, or contribution to the field, rendering a meaningful review of the work itself unfeasible at this stage. An abstract's fundamental role in academic publishing is to provide a concise summary of the article's key aspects, including its central thesis, main arguments, theoretical framework, and primary findings or implications. The current abstract fails entirely to fulfill this purpose. Crucially, it omits vital information such as the original author of the text being translated, the original language and context of the source material, the specific philosophical or artistic traditions of "aesthetic pleasures" being explored, and the scholarly significance of presenting this particular translation. Without this foundational context, prospective readers and reviewers alike have no basis to understand what kind of text this is or what it aims to achieve. Consequently, based solely on the provided title and abstract, this submission is critically incomplete and unreviewable in its current state. It does not meet the basic standards for academic journal submissions. Before any further consideration for publication, the authors must submit a comprehensively revised abstract that clearly outlines the original work's author, source, historical and intellectual context, the specific themes or theories of "aesthetic pleasures" it addresses, and the potential scholarly contribution of this translated piece. Only with such essential information can the paper be adequately evaluated through the peer-review process.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.