Rusli Karel Akanfani, Djakariah Dkaraiah, Delsy A. Dethan

Perjuangan Rakyat Dijazirah Kabola Alor Melawan Belanda Di Bawah Pimpinan Lawono Pada Tahun 1916

Introduction

Perjuangan rakyat dijazirah kabola alor melawan belanda di bawah pimpinan lawono pada tahun 1916. Analisis perjuangan rakyat Jazirah Kabola Alor melawan Belanda tahun 1916 di bawah Lawono. Ungkap latar belakang, proses, dampak, termasuk pajak & kerja rodi.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan (1) Latar belakang terjadinya perjuangan rakyat di Jazirah Kabola Alor melawan Belanda, (2) Proses perjuangan rakyat di Jazirah Kabola Alor melawan Belanda, (3) Dampak dari perjuangan rakyat di Jazirah Kabola Alor melawan Belanda. Penelitian menggunakan metode sejarah yang dilakukan dengan langkah heuristik, kritik sejarah, interpretasi dan historiografi. Dalam hasil penelitian diuraikan; 1 Perjuangan rakyat di Jazirah Kabola Alor melawan Belanda di bawah pimpinan Lawono pada tahun 1916 dilatarbelakangi oleh beberapa hal sebagai berikut :(a). Peralihan kekuasaan.(b). Penerapan pembayaran pajak yang sangat besar (c). Kerja rodi 2. Proses Perjuangan Rakyat Di Jazirah Kabola Alor Melawan Belanda Di Bawah Pimpinan Lawono Pada Tahun 1916 3. Dampak Perjuangan Rakyat Di Jazirah Kabola Alor Melawan Belanda Di Bawah Pimpinan Lawono Pada Tahun 1916. Pejuangan Lawono di Jazirah Kabola melawan Belanda membawa dampak positif dan dampak negarif.

Review

This paper, "Perjuangan Rakyat Dijazirah Kabola Alor Melawan Belanda Di Bawah Pimpinan Lawono Pada Tahun 1916," presents a focused and important historical inquiry into a specific instance of anti-colonial resistance in Indonesia. The clarity of its objectives—uncovering the background, process, and impact of the struggle led by Lawono—is commendable, providing a structured approach to a significant historical event. The proposed methodology, based on established historical research steps (heuristics, criticism, interpretation, and historiography), is entirely appropriate for this type of study. By bringing to light a local struggle from the Kabola Alor Peninsula, the research promises to enrich the broader understanding of regional responses to Dutch colonial rule, an area often underrepresented in national historical narratives. The abstract effectively outlines the preliminary findings, particularly identifying key drivers behind the resistance. The enumeration of factors such as the "peralihan kekuasaan" (change of power), "penerapan pembayaran pajak yang sangat besar" (excessive tax imposition), and "kerja rodi" (forced labor) provides a clear understanding of the grievances that fueled the uprising. These are classic motivators for anti-colonial movements and set a strong foundation for the analysis. While the abstract lists "Proses Perjuangan Rakyat..." and "Dampak Perjuangan Rakyat..." without further detail, it is anticipated that the full manuscript will elaborate significantly on the specific sequence of events, tactical approaches, participant dynamics, and a comprehensive dissection of both the positive and negative long-term consequences of Lawono's leadership and the ensuing struggle. Overall, this paper holds significant potential to contribute to the historiography of anti-colonial movements in Indonesia, particularly by offering a granular, local-level perspective. To maximize its impact, the full paper should strive for analytical depth, moving beyond mere description to a robust interpretation of causality and consequence, potentially situating Lawono's struggle within broader theoretical frameworks of resistance or comparative studies with other regional uprisings. Given the focused nature of the study and its clear aims, this research is a valuable addition to the field, offering insights into a specific chapter of Indonesian history that deserves scholarly attention. I recommend its publication, subject to a thorough review of the full manuscript to ensure the promised depth and rigor.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.